Hoa v. Cate et al

Filing 139

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 137 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 119 Amended Complaint, filed by Stag Leasing, Inc., T. Gregory Stagnito, David F. Lopez, Bridge Transport. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/25/14. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2014)

Case3:12-cv-02078-EMC Document137 Filed06/23/14 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4

JOHN F. GEARY, ESQ. SBN 137777
RAYMOND J. FULLERTON. SBN 219264
ROBERT W. HENKELS, ESQ. SBN 255410
GEARY, SHEA, O’DONNELL, GRATTAN & MITCHELL, P.C.
37 Old Courthouse Square, Fourth Floor
Santa Rosa, California 95404
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
707/545-1876

5
6

Attorneys for Defendants
DAVID F. LOPEZ, T. GREGORY STAGNITTO;
BRIDGE TRANSPORT, STAG LEASING INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
PAUL HOA, an individual,

CASE NO.: CV 12 2078 EMC

11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
RICHARD RILEY, an individual; et. al.

PLAINTIFF AND NON-STATE
DEFENDANTS STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER
THEREON

14
Defendants.
15
16
17

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1, plaintiff and the defendants DAVID F.

18

LOPEZ, T. GREGORY STAGNITTO, BRIDGE TRANSPORT, and STAG LEASING INC.,

19

through their respective counsel, agree and stipulate as follows:

20

1.

Plaintiff PAUL HOA filed his original complaint on April 25, 2012, and filed an

21

Amended Complaint on July 27, 2012. Defendants DAVID F. LOPEZ, T. GREGORY

22

STAGNITTO, BRIDGE TRANSPORT, and STAG LEASING INC. filed an answer to the First

23

Amended Complaint on September 13, 2012.

24

2.

This Court issued its Order denying codefendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Third

25
LAW OFFICES OF

GEARY,
SHEA,
O’DONNELL,
GRATTAN &

MITCHELL
P.C.

Amended Complaint on May 23, 2014. The parties agreed to answer the Third Amended

26

Complaint by June 23, 2014.

27
28

3.

Plaintiff and defendants DAVID F. LOPEZ, T. GREGORY STAGNITTO, BRIDGE

TRANSPORT, and STAG LEASING INC. have agreed to extend the time to answer the Third
________________________________________________________________________________
-1Stipulation to Answer Third Amended Complaint

Case3:12-cv-02078-EMC Document137 Filed06/23/14 Page2 of 2

1

Amended Complaint to Friday, June 27, 2014.
4.

2
3

This extension of time does not alter any other dates or events already fixed by the

Court.

4

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

5

DATED: June 23, 2014
LAW OFFICE OF GENE H. SHIODA

6

_____/s/________________________________
GENE H. SHIODA
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PAUL HOA

7
8
9
DATED: June 23, 2014

10

GEARY SHEA O’DONNELL
GRATTAN & MITCHELL, PC

11
12

_____/s/_______________________________
ROBERT W. HENKELS
Attorneys for Defendants
DAVID F. LOPEZ, T. GREGORY STAGNITTO;
BRIDGE TRANSPORT, and STAG LEASING
INC.

13
14
15
16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

17
Date:

June 25, 2014

25
LAW OFFICES OF

GEARY,
SHEA,
O’DONNELL,
GRATTAN &

MITCHELL
P.C.

S

ER

R NIA

FO

dwar
Judge E

H

24

RT

23

en

d M. Ch

NO

22

DERED

O OR
_________________________________________
IT IS S District Court Judge
United States

LI

21

UNIT
ED

20

RT
U
O

19

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

18

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________
-2Stipulation to Answer Third Amended Complaint