Hoa v. Cate et al

Filing 143

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 142 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 138 Crossclaim, to Extend Time to Answer filed by Stag Leasing, Inc., T. Gregory Stagnito, David F. Lopez, Bridge Transport. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/22/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2014)

1
2
3
4

JOHN F. GEARY, ESQ. SBN 137777
RAYMOND J. FULLERTON. SBN 219264
ROBERT W. HENKELS, ESQ. SBN 255410
GEARY, SHEA, O’DONNELL, GRATTAN & MITCHELL, P.C.
37 Old Courthouse Square, Fourth Floor
Santa Rosa, California 95404
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
707/545-1876

5
6

Attorneys for Defendants
DAVID F. LOPEZ, T. GREGORY STAGNITTO;
BRIDGE TRANSPORT, STAG LEASING INC.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
PAUL HOA, an individual,

CASE NO.: CV 12 2078 EMC

11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
RICHARD RILEY, an individual; et. al.

PLAINTIFF AND NON-STATE
DEFENDANTS STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER THIRD
AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER
THEREON

14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
LAW OFFICES OF

GEARY,
SHEA,
O’DONNELL,
GRATTAN &

MITCHELL
P.C.

26

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 6-1, cross-plaintiffs RICHARD RILEY,
RAYMOND MATEUCCI, DAVID MOORE, RONALD CHAN, TAMMY FOSS, THOMAS
ALIOTO, and GEORGE MOON (“Cross-Plaintiffs”) and cross-defendants DAVID F. LOPEZ, T.
GREGORY STAGNITTO, BRIDGE TRANSPORT, and STAG LEASING INC (“CrossDefendants”) , through their respective counsel, agree and stipulate as follows:
1.

Cross-Plaintiffs filed a Cross-claim for Equitable Indemnity, Contribution, and

Declaratory Relief against Cross-Defendants on June 23, 2014.
2.

Cross-Plaintiffs and Cross-Defendants hereby agree to extend Cross-Defendants’

time to respond to the Cross-Claim to July 28, 2014.
3.

The Court has set this matter for a further CMC on October 9, 2014. Thus, this

extension of time does not alter any other dates or events already fixed by the Court.

27
28
________________________________________________________________________________
-1Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Cross-Claim

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2

DATED: July 17, 2014

3
4
5

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
PATRICK R. MCKINNEY
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
_____/s/________________________________
MANEESH SHARMA
JAMES J. JIRN
Attorneys for Defendants and Cross-Plaintiffs
RICHARD RILEY, RAYMOND MATEUCCI,
DAVID MOORE, RONALD CHAN,TAMMY FOSS,
THOMAS ALIOTO, and GEORGE MOON

6
7
8
9
DATED: July 17, 2014

10

GEARY SHEA O’DONNELL
GRATTAN & MITCHELL, PC

11
12

_____/s/_______________________________
ROBERT W. HENKELS
Attorneys for Defendants
DAVID F. LOPEZ, T. GREGORY STAGNITTO;
BRIDGE TRANSPORT, and STAG LEASING
INC.

13
14
15

23

FO

ER

H

22

n
_________________________________________
M. Che
EdwardCourt Judge
United StateseDistrict
Judg

RT

21

TED

GRAN

NO

20

July 22, 2014

LI

19

Date:

A

18

R NIA

17

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

UNIT
ED

16

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

24
25
LAW OFFICES OF

GEARY,
SHEA,
O’DONNELL,
GRATTAN &

MITCHELL
P.C.

26
27
28
________________________________________________________________________________
-2Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Cross-Claim