Hoa v. Cate et al

Filing 45

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 44 GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT OR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND filed by Matthew Cate. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 2/20/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
JAY M. GOLDMAN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
MANEESH SHARMA
Deputy Attorney General
State Bar No. 280084
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Matthew Cate

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13

PAUL HOA,

C 12-2078 EMC

14
v.

15
16
17

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

18

Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT OR
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
Judge:
The Hon. Edward M. Chen
Defendants. Trial Date:
None
Action Filed: April 25, 2012

19
20

The parties, by and through their counsel or record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

21

1.

In its Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 32, the Court granted

22

Plaintiff Paul Hoa 120 days from November 9, 2012 to file a second amended complaint upon a

23

stipulation by the affected parties, or to file a motion for leave to file a second amended

24

complaint.

25

2.

Plaintiff served Special Interrogatories to dismissed party Matthew Cate. Due to the

26

fact that Cate requested additional time to respond to Special Interrogatories and not to prejudice

27

the Plaintiff, at the request of Plaintiff’s counsel, Defendants T. Gregory Stagnitto, Bridge

28

Transport, Stag Leasing Inc., and David F. Lopez, by and through their counsel, stipulate that the
1
Stip. And [Proposed] Order Granting Extension Time(C 12-2078 EMC )

1

Plaintiff’s time to file a second amended complaint upon a stipulation by the affected parties, or

2

to file a motion for leave to amend, shall be extended by fourteen (14) days from Monday March

3

11, 2013 to Monday March 25, 2013.

4
5
6

3.

Dismissed-party Matthew Cate, by and through his counsel, stipulates that he has no

objection to this fourteen (14) day extension.
4.

A Case Management Conference is currently set in this matter for March 21, 2013.

7

Plaintiff and Defendants wish to maintain that current hearing date and thus, the instant requested

8

time modification shall not affect the schedule for this case. Dismissed party Cate has no

9

objection to this request.

10

SO STIPULATED:

11
12

DATED: February 12, 2013

13

_s/ Gene H. Shioda____________
GENE H. SHIODA
JAMES A. KIM
JASON Y. LIE
Attorneys for Plaintiff Paul Hoa

14
15
16
17

LAW OFFICE OF GENE H. SHIODA

DATED: February 12, 2013

GEARY, SHEA, O’DONNELL, GRATTAN,
AND MITCHELL

18
_s/ John F. Geary______________
JOHN F. GEARY
ROBERT W. HENKELS
Attorneys for Defendants
David F. Lopez, T. Gregory Stagnitto,
Bridge Transport, Stag Leasing Inc.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED: February 12, 2013

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
JAY M. GOLDMAN
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
_s/ Maneesh Sharma___________
MANEESH SHARMA
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for
Matthew Cate
2
Stip. And [Proposed] Order Granting Extension Time(C 12-2078 EMC )

3

Dated: ___________________________

S

ER

R NIA

FO
A

H

8

en

d M. Ch

dwar
Judge E

LI

RT

7

SF2012205056
20671020.doc

__________________________
RED
The Honorable RDE M. Chen
IS SO OEdward
IT
United States District Court Judge

NO

5

UNIT
ED

4

6

RT
U
O

2

S DISTRICT
TE
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.A
C
T
2/20/13

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stip. And [Proposed] Order Granting Extension Time(C 12-2078 EMC )