Hernandez v. Final Score Sports Bar, Inc et al
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING 38 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White4 on 6/13/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013)
Case3:12-cv-02080-JSW Document38 Filed06/12/13 Page1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PAUL L. REIN, State Bar No. 43053
CELIA MCGUINNESS, State Bar No. 159420
CATHERINE M. CABALO, State Bar No. 248198
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 832-5001
Facsimile: (510) 832-4787
reinlawoffice@aol.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GERARDO HERNANDEZ
* Defendants’ counsel listed after the caption
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
GERARDO HERNANDEZ,
v.
Plaintiff,
Case No. C12-2080 JSW
Civil Rights
FINAL SCORE SPORTS BAR, INC.;
MAPLE LEAF INVESTMENTS, LLC;
and DOES 1-10, Inclusive,
Defendants.
16
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to FRCP 41 & LR 7-12
GAZZERA, O’GRADY & STEVENS
MICHAEL K. STEVENS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 96112)
1134 W. El Camino Real
18 Mountain View, CA 94040
Telephone: 650/968-9612
19 Facsimile: 650/968-1627
mkstevenslaw1@aol.com
17
20
21
Attorneys for Defendant
FINAL SCORE SPORTS BAR, INC.
22
ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT
SHARON HIGHTOWER, ESQ. (State Bar No. 129874)
152 North Third Street, Suite 700
24 San Jose, CA 95112
Telephone: 408/286-0880
25 Facsimile: 408/286-0337
23
26
Attorneys for Defendant
MAPLE LEAF INVESTMENTS, LLC
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C12-2080 JSW
S:\CASES\F\FINAL SCORE\PLEADINGS\2013 06 12 Stip & Order RE Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC
Case3:12-cv-02080-JSW Document38 Filed06/12/13 Page2 of 5
1
TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT AND TO ALL
2
PARTIES AND TO THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
3
Plaintiff GERARDO HERNANDEZ and defendants FINAL SCORE
4
5
SPORTS BAR, INC. and MAPLE LEAF INVESTMENTS, LLC (together the
6
“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as
7
follows:
8
1.
The Parties have entered into a Consent Decree and Order
9
resolving all claims in this case (Order entered as Docket No. 37). As such, the
10
Parties agree to dismiss this case with prejudice, each party to bear his/its own
11
attorney fees and costs.
12
13
2.
Accordingly the Parties request that the Court to dismiss this
action with prejudice.
14
15
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
16
17
DATED: June 12, 2013
18
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN
By:
/s/ Catherine Cabalo
Catherine Cabalo, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
GERARDO HERNANDEZ
19
20
21
22
DATED: June 12, 2013
GAZZERA, O’GRADY & STEVENS
23
By:
/s/ Michael K. Stevens
Michael K. Stevens, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
FINAL SCORE SPORTS BAR, INC.
24
25
26
-2-
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C12-2080 JSW
S:\CASES\F\FINAL SCORE\PLEADINGS\2013 06 12 Stip & Order RE Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC
Case3:12-cv-02080-JSW Document38 Filed06/12/13 Page3 of 5
1
DATED: June 12, 2013
ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT
2
3
By:
/s/ Sharon L. Hightower
Sharon L. Hightower, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant
MAPLE LEAF INVESTMENTS, LLC
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C12-2080 JSW
S:\CASES\F\FINAL SCORE\PLEADINGS\2013 06 12 Stip & Order RE Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC
Case3:12-cv-02080-JSW Document38 Filed06/12/13 Page4 of 5
ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 This case shall be DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear his/its own
3 attorney fees and costs.
1
4
5
6
2013
June 13
Dated: __________, 2012
7
__________________________________
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-4-
27
28
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. C12-2080 JSW
S:\CASES\F\FINAL SCORE\PLEADINGS\2013 06 12 Stip & Order RE Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?