Hernandez v. Final Score Sports Bar, Inc et al

Filing 39

ORDER GRANTING 38 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White4 on 6/13/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-02080-JSW Document38 Filed06/12/13 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PAUL L. REIN, State Bar No. 43053 CELIA MCGUINNESS, State Bar No. 159420 CATHERINE M. CABALO, State Bar No. 248198 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN 200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 832-5001 Facsimile: (510) 832-4787 reinlawoffice@aol.com Attorneys for Plaintiff GERARDO HERNANDEZ * Defendants’ counsel listed after the caption UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 GERARDO HERNANDEZ, v. Plaintiff, Case No. C12-2080 JSW Civil Rights FINAL SCORE SPORTS BAR, INC.; MAPLE LEAF INVESTMENTS, LLC; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants. 16 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to FRCP 41 & LR 7-12 GAZZERA, O’GRADY & STEVENS MICHAEL K. STEVENS, ESQ. (State Bar No. 96112) 1134 W. El Camino Real 18 Mountain View, CA 94040 Telephone: 650/968-9612 19 Facsimile: 650/968-1627 mkstevenslaw1@aol.com 17 20 21 Attorneys for Defendant FINAL SCORE SPORTS BAR, INC. 22 ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT SHARON HIGHTOWER, ESQ. (State Bar No. 129874) 152 North Third Street, Suite 700 24 San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone: 408/286-0880 25 Facsimile: 408/286-0337 23 26 Attorneys for Defendant MAPLE LEAF INVESTMENTS, LLC 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C12-2080 JSW S:\CASES\F\FINAL SCORE\PLEADINGS\2013 06 12 Stip & Order RE Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC Case3:12-cv-02080-JSW Document38 Filed06/12/13 Page2 of 5 1 TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE ENTITLED COURT AND TO ALL 2 PARTIES AND TO THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 3 Plaintiff GERARDO HERNANDEZ and defendants FINAL SCORE 4 5 SPORTS BAR, INC. and MAPLE LEAF INVESTMENTS, LLC (together the 6 “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as 7 follows: 8 1. The Parties have entered into a Consent Decree and Order 9 resolving all claims in this case (Order entered as Docket No. 37). As such, the 10 Parties agree to dismiss this case with prejudice, each party to bear his/its own 11 attorney fees and costs. 12 13 2. Accordingly the Parties request that the Court to dismiss this action with prejudice. 14 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 16 17 DATED: June 12, 2013 18 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN By: /s/ Catherine Cabalo Catherine Cabalo, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff GERARDO HERNANDEZ 19 20 21 22 DATED: June 12, 2013 GAZZERA, O’GRADY & STEVENS 23 By: /s/ Michael K. Stevens Michael K. Stevens, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant FINAL SCORE SPORTS BAR, INC. 24 25 26 -2- 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C12-2080 JSW S:\CASES\F\FINAL SCORE\PLEADINGS\2013 06 12 Stip & Order RE Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC Case3:12-cv-02080-JSW Document38 Filed06/12/13 Page3 of 5 1 DATED: June 12, 2013 ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT 2 3 By: /s/ Sharon L. Hightower Sharon L. Hightower, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant MAPLE LEAF INVESTMENTS, LLC 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -3- 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C12-2080 JSW S:\CASES\F\FINAL SCORE\PLEADINGS\2013 06 12 Stip & Order RE Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC Case3:12-cv-02080-JSW Document38 Filed06/12/13 Page4 of 5 ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 This case shall be DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear his/its own 3 attorney fees and costs. 1 4 5 6 2013 June 13 Dated: __________, 2012 7 __________________________________ Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -4- 27 28 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. C12-2080 JSW S:\CASES\F\FINAL SCORE\PLEADINGS\2013 06 12 Stip & Order RE Dismissal w_ Prejudice.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?