ASUS Computer International v. Round Rock Research, LLC

Filing 210

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 207 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER regarding taking expert depositions after current deadline for expert discovery filed by Asustek Computer, Inc., ASUS Computer International. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 5, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 John P. Schnurer, Bar No. 185725 JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com Jack Ko, Bar No. 244630 JKo@perkinscoie.com Michael J. Engle, Bar No. 259476 MEngle@perkinscoie.com Tawen Chang, Bar No. 215512 TChang@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 11988 El Camino Real, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130-3334 Telephone: 858.720.5700 Facsimile: 858.720.5799 James C. Pistorino, Bar No. 226496 JPistorino@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 Telephone: 650.838.4300 Facsimile: 650.838.4350 Attorneys for Plaintiff ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL and Counterclaim Defendant ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 17 ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, 18 19 20 Case No. 3:12-cv-02099-JST Plaintiff, v. ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC, 21 Defendant. STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER PERMITTING THE TAKING OF CERTAIN EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY 22 23 ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC, 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff, v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, Defendants. 28 LEGAL29229644.1 CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY 1 In light of the schedule of the witnesses, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant ASUS 2 Computer International (“ACI”) and Counterclaim Defendant ASUSTeK Computer Inc. 3 (“ASUSTeK”) (collectively “ASUS”), and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Round Rock 4 Research, LLC (“RRR”), have agreed to take certain depositions relating to expert discovery on 5 or about the following dates: 6 Witness Date Kevin Gibb, TechInsights February 11, 2014 David Yurkerwich February 14, 2014 Keith Ugone February 18, 2014 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Expert discovery is currently scheduled to close on February 7, 2014. (D.I. 154.) Therefore, the above depositions will occur after the deadline for expert discovery. Nevertheless, RRR and ASUS have agreed that these deposition(s) may be taken out of time and that the parties will not object to such depositions solely on the basis that such deposition(s) are scheduled to take place after the close of expert discovery. In addition, the parties agree that these depositions will be treated as though they were taken within the original expert discovery period. Specifically, the parties will not object to the following on the basis that such requests are untimely as outside the expert discovery period: (1) a request by the deposing party for documents and other discoverable information that are properly within the scope of expert discovery, the existence and non-production of which is first discovered during these depositions; and (2) to the extent an impasse is reached, any motion brought by the deposing party to compel such materials identified in (1), where the motion is brought no more than 7 days after the deposition in which the existence and non-production of the materials is first discovered. 25 26 27 28 LEGAL29229644.1 -1- CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY 1 DATED: February 3, 2014 2 PERKINS COIE LLP By: /s/ Tawen Chang John P. Schnurer, Bar No. 185725 JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com Jack Ko, Bar No. 244630 JKo@perkinscoie.com Michael J. Engle, Bar No. 259476 MEngle@perkinscoie.com Tawen Chang, Bar No. 215512 Tchang@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 11988 El Camino Real, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130-3334 Telephone: 858.720.5700 Facsimile: 858.720.5799 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 James C. Pistorino, Bar No. 226496 JPistorino@perkinscoie.com PERKINS COIE LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212 Telephone: 650.838.4300 Facsimile: 650.838.4350 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL and Counterclaim Defendant ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2LEGAL29229644.1 CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY 1 Dated: February 3, 2014 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BLACK & HAMILL LLP By: /s/ Lauren Nowierski Bradford J. Black (SBN 252031) bblack@blackandhamill.com Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 251156) ahamill@blackandhamill.com 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel.: 415-813-6210 Fax: 415-813-6222 Local Counsel for Plaintiff Round Rock Research, LLC Paul A. Bondor (admitted pro hac vice) pbondor@desmaraisllp.com Justin P.D. Wilcox (admitted pro hac vice) jwilcox@desmaraisllp.com Jonas R. McDavit (admitted pro hac vice) jmcdavit@desmaraisllp.com Lauren M. Nowierski (admitted pro hac vice) lnowierski@desmaraisllp.com DESMARAIS LLP 230 Park Avenue New York, NY 10169 Tel.: 212- 351-3400 Fax: 212-351-3401 Lead Counsel for Plaintiff Round Rock Research, LLC 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3LEGAL29229644.1 CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY 1 2 I, Tawen Chang, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto. 3 4 DATED: February 3, 2014 PERKINS COIE LLP 5 By: /s/ Tawen Chang Tawen Chang TChang@perkinscoie.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL and Counterclaim Defendant ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. 8 9 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 S Dated: __________________ February 5, 2014 RT U O 13 14 O IT IS S ORDER 15 NO RT ER 18 S . Ti ga r A H 17 n J u d ge J o LI 16 R NIA The Honorable Jon S. Tigar UNITED STATES DISTRICT D E JUDGE UNIT ED 12 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 10 N F D IS T IC T O R C 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4LEGAL29229644.1 CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?