ASUS Computer International v. Round Rock Research, LLC
Filing
210
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 207 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER regarding taking expert depositions after current deadline for expert discovery filed by Asustek Computer, Inc., ASUS Computer International. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 5, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
John P. Schnurer, Bar No. 185725
JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com
Jack Ko, Bar No. 244630
JKo@perkinscoie.com
Michael J. Engle, Bar No. 259476
MEngle@perkinscoie.com
Tawen Chang, Bar No. 215512
TChang@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
11988 El Camino Real, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92130-3334
Telephone: 858.720.5700
Facsimile: 858.720.5799
James C. Pistorino, Bar No. 226496
JPistorino@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: 650.838.4300
Facsimile: 650.838.4350
Attorneys for Plaintiff ASUS COMPUTER
INTERNATIONAL and Counterclaim Defendant
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
18
19
20
Case No. 3:12-cv-02099-JST
Plaintiff,
v.
ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,
21
Defendant.
STIPULATED AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
PERMITTING THE TAKING OF
CERTAIN EXPERT DEPOSITIONS
AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT
DISCOVERY
22
23
ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,
24
25
26
27
Plaintiff,
v.
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and
ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
Defendants.
28
LEGAL29229644.1
CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST
STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE
OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
1
In light of the schedule of the witnesses, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant ASUS
2
Computer International (“ACI”) and Counterclaim Defendant ASUSTeK Computer Inc.
3
(“ASUSTeK”) (collectively “ASUS”), and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Round Rock
4
Research, LLC (“RRR”), have agreed to take certain depositions relating to expert discovery on
5
or about the following dates:
6
Witness
Date
Kevin Gibb, TechInsights
February 11, 2014
David Yurkerwich
February 14, 2014
Keith Ugone
February 18, 2014
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Expert discovery is currently scheduled to close on February 7, 2014. (D.I. 154.)
Therefore, the above depositions will occur after the deadline for expert discovery.
Nevertheless, RRR and ASUS have agreed that these deposition(s) may be taken out of time and
that the parties will not object to such depositions solely on the basis that such deposition(s) are
scheduled to take place after the close of expert discovery.
In addition, the parties agree that these depositions will be treated as though they were
taken within the original expert discovery period. Specifically, the parties will not object to the
following on the basis that such requests are untimely as outside the expert discovery period: (1)
a request by the deposing party for documents and other discoverable information that are
properly within the scope of expert discovery, the existence and non-production of which is first
discovered during these depositions; and (2) to the extent an impasse is reached, any motion
brought by the deposing party to compel such materials identified in (1), where the motion is
brought no more than 7 days after the deposition in which the existence and non-production of
the materials is first discovered.
25
26
27
28
LEGAL29229644.1
-1-
CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST
STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE
OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
1
DATED: February 3, 2014
2
PERKINS COIE LLP
By: /s/ Tawen Chang
John P. Schnurer, Bar No. 185725
JSchnurer@perkinscoie.com
Jack Ko, Bar No. 244630
JKo@perkinscoie.com
Michael J. Engle, Bar No. 259476
MEngle@perkinscoie.com
Tawen Chang, Bar No. 215512
Tchang@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
11988 El Camino Real, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92130-3334
Telephone: 858.720.5700
Facsimile: 858.720.5799
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
James C. Pistorino, Bar No. 226496
JPistorino@perkinscoie.com
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: 650.838.4300
Facsimile: 650.838.4350
11
12
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiff ASUS COMPUTER
INTERNATIONAL and Counterclaim Defendant
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2LEGAL29229644.1
CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST
STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE
OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
1
Dated: February 3, 2014
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BLACK & HAMILL LLP
By: /s/ Lauren Nowierski
Bradford J. Black (SBN 252031)
bblack@blackandhamill.com
Andrew G. Hamill (SBN 251156)
ahamill@blackandhamill.com
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: 415-813-6210
Fax: 415-813-6222
Local Counsel for Plaintiff
Round Rock Research, LLC
Paul A. Bondor (admitted pro hac vice)
pbondor@desmaraisllp.com
Justin P.D. Wilcox (admitted pro hac vice)
jwilcox@desmaraisllp.com
Jonas R. McDavit (admitted pro hac vice)
jmcdavit@desmaraisllp.com
Lauren M. Nowierski (admitted pro hac vice)
lnowierski@desmaraisllp.com
DESMARAIS LLP
230 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10169
Tel.: 212- 351-3400
Fax: 212-351-3401
Lead Counsel for Plaintiff
Round Rock Research, LLC
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3LEGAL29229644.1
CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST
STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE
OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
1
2
I, Tawen Chang, hereby attest, pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45, that the
concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.
3
4
DATED: February 3, 2014
PERKINS COIE LLP
5
By: /s/ Tawen Chang
Tawen Chang
TChang@perkinscoie.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff ASUS COMPUTER
INTERNATIONAL and Counterclaim Defendant
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC.
8
9
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
S
Dated: __________________
February 5, 2014
RT
U
O
13
14
O
IT IS S
ORDER
15
NO
RT
ER
18
S . Ti ga r
A
H
17
n
J u d ge J o
LI
16
R NIA
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT D
E JUDGE
UNIT
ED
12
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
10
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4LEGAL29229644.1
CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-02099-JST
STIPULATION RE TAKING DEPOSITIONS OUTSIDE
OF CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?