ASUS Computer International v. Round Rock Research, LLC
Filing
360
ORDER RE: CONDUCT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING; SETTING SECOND SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING. Second Summary Judgment Hearing set for 5/13/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 3, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
Case No. 12-cv-02099-JST
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER RE: CONDUCT OF SUMMARY
JUDGMENT HEARING; SETTING
SECOND SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HEARING
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Because the parties’ motions to strike portions of expert reports, currently pending before
14
Judge Cousins, will affect the record before the Court relevant to the parties’ motions for summary
15
judgment, the Court ORDERS as follows:
16
1.
At the April 10, 2014 summary judgment hearing, the parties shall focus their
17
arguments on Parts IV.A.1, IV.B.1.(a)–(c), IV.B.2, IV.C, and IV.D of ASUS’ motion for summary
18
judgment, as well as the entirety of Round Rock’s motion for summary judgment, only as the
19
arguments relate to charted accused devices and infringement theories disclosed in Round Rock’s
20
operative infringement contentions.
21
2.
At the April 10 hearing, the parties shall begin their presentations by explaining
22
their view of how the motions to strike affect the relief requested by the parties’ motions for
23
summary judgment. In particular, the parties’ presentations shall include, at a minimum,
24
discussions of:
25
26
a. whether and how the motions to strike affect the evidence concerning the
charted accused devices and charted infringement theories;
27
b. which uncharted accused devices are subject to the motions to strike;
28
c. which infringement theories are subject to the motions to strike;
d. how the motions to strike should affect the Court’s analysis of ASUS’
1
2
motion for summary judgment on the issue of indirect infringement; and
e. how the motions to strike should affect the Court’s analysis of ASUS
3
4
5
Taiwan’s motion for summary judgment on all claims of infringement.
3.
The Court will hold a second summary judgment hearing on May 13, 2014, at
6
2:00 p.m., for the purpose of discussing the remaining summary judgment issues and the effect of
7
the final ruling on the motions to strike on the summary judgment record.
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 3, 2014
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?