ASUS Computer International v. Round Rock Research, LLC

Filing 360

ORDER RE: CONDUCT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING; SETTING SECOND SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING. Second Summary Judgment Hearing set for 5/13/2014 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 3, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, Case No. 12-cv-02099-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC, Defendant. ORDER RE: CONDUCT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING; SETTING SECOND SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Because the parties’ motions to strike portions of expert reports, currently pending before 14 Judge Cousins, will affect the record before the Court relevant to the parties’ motions for summary 15 judgment, the Court ORDERS as follows: 16 1. At the April 10, 2014 summary judgment hearing, the parties shall focus their 17 arguments on Parts IV.A.1, IV.B.1.(a)–(c), IV.B.2, IV.C, and IV.D of ASUS’ motion for summary 18 judgment, as well as the entirety of Round Rock’s motion for summary judgment, only as the 19 arguments relate to charted accused devices and infringement theories disclosed in Round Rock’s 20 operative infringement contentions. 21 2. At the April 10 hearing, the parties shall begin their presentations by explaining 22 their view of how the motions to strike affect the relief requested by the parties’ motions for 23 summary judgment. In particular, the parties’ presentations shall include, at a minimum, 24 discussions of: 25 26 a. whether and how the motions to strike affect the evidence concerning the charted accused devices and charted infringement theories; 27 b. which uncharted accused devices are subject to the motions to strike; 28 c. which infringement theories are subject to the motions to strike; d. how the motions to strike should affect the Court’s analysis of ASUS’ 1 2 motion for summary judgment on the issue of indirect infringement; and e. how the motions to strike should affect the Court’s analysis of ASUS 3 4 5 Taiwan’s motion for summary judgment on all claims of infringement. 3. The Court will hold a second summary judgment hearing on May 13, 2014, at 6 2:00 p.m., for the purpose of discussing the remaining summary judgment issues and the effect of 7 the final ruling on the motions to strike on the summary judgment record. 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 3, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?