ASUS Computer International v. Round Rock Research, LLC

Filing 391

ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 24, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

John P. Schnurer, Bar No. 185725
[e-mail]
Jack Ko, Bar No. 244630
[e-mail]
Michael J. Engle, Bar No. 259476
[e-mail]
Tawen Chang, Bar No. 215512
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
San Diego, CA 92130-2594
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 858.720.5799
James C. Pistorino, Bar No. 226496
[e-mail]
PERKINS COIE LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.838.4350
Attorneys for Plaintiff ASUS COMPUTER
INTERNATIONAL and Counterclaim Defendant
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,

18
19
20

Plaintiff,
v.
ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,

21

Defendant.

Case No. 3:12-CV-02099-JST-NC
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE
PARTIES’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS
TO FILE UNDER SEAL CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(D.I. 273; D.I. 276; D.I. 302; D.I. 304; D.I.
332; D.I. 333; D.I. 353)

22
23

ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,
Counterclaim Plaintiff,

24
25
26
27

v.
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC. and
ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
Counterclaim Defendants.

28
Case No. 3:12-CV-02099-JST -NC
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’
MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL

On April 17, 2014, the Court held a hearing regarding the parties’ administrative

1
2

motions to file under seal confidential information in connection with their motions for

3

summary judgment (the “Sealing Motions”) (D.I. 273; D.I. 276; D.I. 302; D.I. 304; D.I. 332;

4

D.I. 333; and D.I. 353). Having considered the Sealing Motions, the Court hereby ORDERS

5

that:

6

1.

All the Sealing Motions are withdrawn without prejudice;

7

2.

The documents sought to file under seal in the Sealing Motions will temporarily

8
9
10

remain sealed; and
3.

The parties shall re-submit the Sealing Motions by May 8, 2014 in a manner

pursuant to the Court’s instructions at the April 17, 2014 hearing.

11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13

Dated: April 24, 2014
Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case No. 3:12-CV-02099-JST -NC
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES’
MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL