ASUS Computer International v. Round Rock Research, LLC
Filing
59
ORDER RESCHEDULING TUTORIAL AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING. Technology Tutorial Hearing set for 4/16/2013 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Claims Construction Hearing set for 5/1/2013 at 9:30 AM. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 3, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
Case No. 12-cv-02099-JST
Plaintiff,
5
ORDER RESCHEDULING TUTORIAL
AND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
HEARING
v.
6
7
ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,
Defendant.
8
9
To resolve a conflict in the Court’s schedule, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
reschedules the Tutorial and Claim Construction Hearing in this action as follows:
12
Technology Tutorial:
April 16, 2013, 9:30 a.m.
13
Claim Construction Hearing:
May 1, 2013, 9:30 a.m.
14
Both the technology tutorial and the claim construction hearing will take place in
15
Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco, CA 94102.
16
The Court will reserve no more than two and one half hours on its calendar for the tutorial,
17
including a brief recess. The tutorial will not be reported by a Court Reporter. The Court assumes
18
that the parties will meet and confer about, and reach a stipulation regarding, the conduct of the
19
tutorial, including the division of time between them and the extent of any presentation by experts.
20
The court will adopt the parties' agreement as its order. If the parties are not able to reach
21
agreement on the parameters of the tutorial, they should advise the Court in a joint letter of not
22
longer than one page by April 8, 2013.
The parties shall each have one hour for presentation of argument and testimony at the
23
24
claim construction hearing. The Court assumes that the parties will meet and confer about, and
25
reach a stipulation regarding, the conduct of the claim construction hearing, including the division
26
of time between them and the extent of any presentation by experts. The court will adopt the
27
parties' agreement as its order. If the parties are not able to reach agreement on the parameters of
28
///
1
the claim construction hearing, they should advise the Court in a joint letter of not longer than one
2
page by April 8, 2013.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 3, 2013
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?