Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated et al v. N.R. Hamm Quarry, LLC

Filing 41

ORDER GRANTING 40 STIPULATION RE: Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/7/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2012)

Case3:12-cv-02127-JSW Document40 Filed11/06/12 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5

Robin M. Wall (S.B. # 235690)
[e-mail]
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6

Counsel for Plaintiffs

7

(Additional Counsel listed on signature page)

8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16

Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
Incorporated, as successor by merger to Banc of
America Securities LLC, Jason David Glidden,
and Verlin Olen Dobkins,
Plaintiffs,

17
18
19

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
SCHEDULING ORDER
Date: December 14, 2012
Time: 9:00 A.M.
Location: Courtroom 11, 19th Floor
Before: Hon. Jeffrey S. White

v.
N.R. Hamm Quarry, LLC,

20
21

No. 3:12-cv-02127-JSW

Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:12-CV-02127-JSW

Case3:12-cv-02127-JSW Document40 Filed11/06/12 Page2 of 4

1

STIPULATION

2

Plaintiffs Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as successor by merger to

3

Banc of America Securities LLC, Jason David Glidden, and Verlin Olen Dobkins, and

4

Defendant N.R. Hamm Quarry, LLC, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby

5

stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, under this Court’s September 4, 2012 Order, (i) Plaintiffs shall file their reply in

6
7

support of the cross-motion for summary judgment by November 9, 2012; and (ii) the hearing on

8

Defendant’s motion to dismiss and Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment is on December 14,

9

2012;

10

WHEREAS, in light of recent disruptions caused by Hurricane Sandy, the parties have

11

conferred, and agreed to a modest extension of the time for Plaintiffs to file their reply in support of the

12

cross-motion for summary judgment; and

13

WHEREAS, IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs

14

and Defendant, acting through their representative counsel, subject to this Court’s approval, as follows:

15

1.

November 14, 2012; and

16
17

Plaintiffs shall file their reply in support of the cross-motion for summary judgment by

2.

The Court’s September 4, 2012 Order shall otherwise remain in full effect.

18
19

Dated: November 6, 2012

20

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP

21

By: ___/s/ B. Andrew Bednark_________

22
23
24
25

Robin M. Wall (S.B. # 235690)
[e-mail]
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

26
27
28

Jonathan Rosenberg (S.B. # 1992890)
[e-mail] (pro hac vice)
B. Andrew Bednark (S.B. # 4160362)
[e-mail] (pro hac vice)
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:12-CV-02127-JSW

Case3:12-cv-02127-JSW Document40 Filed11/06/12 Page3 of 4

3

7 Times Square
New York, New York 10036
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

4

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

5

GIRARD GIBBS LLP

6

By: __/s/ Jonathan K. Levine_______
Daniel C. Girard (S.B. # 114826)
[e-mail]
Jonathan K. Levine (S.B. # 220289)
[e-mail]
601 California Street, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

1
2

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

STUEVE SIEGEL HANSON LLP
Norman E. Siegel (S.B. # 44378)
[e-mail] (pro hac vice application forthcoming)
Rachel E. Schwartz (S.B. # 56241)
[e-mail] (pro hac vice application forthcoming)
Matthew L. Dameron (S.B. # 52093)
[e-mail] (pro hac vice application forthcoming)
460 Nichols Road, Suite 200
Kansas City, Missouri 64112
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

19
20

Attorneys for Defendant

21
22
23
24
25
26

Attestation
I hereby attest that I have obtained concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation from all of
the parties listed in the signature blocks above.
Dated: November 6, 2012
By: __/s/ B. Andrew Bednark___________
B. Andrew Bednark, Attorney for Plaintiffs

27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:12-CV-02127-JSW

Case3:12-cv-02127-JSW Document40 Filed11/06/12 Page4 of 4

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3

Having reviewed the above stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

November 14, 2012; and

4
5

Plaintiffs shall file their reply in support of the cross-motion for summary judgment by

2.

The Court’s September 4, 2012 Order shall otherwise remain in full effect.

6
7
8
9

7
Dated: November __, 2012

__________________________________
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:12-CV-02127-JSW