Arroyo v. Chattem, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER re 21 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference and Relevant Case Management Deadlines Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 filed by Chattem, Inc.. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 11/9/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/9/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)

Case3:12-cv-02129-CRB Document21 Filed07/05/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

M. Kevin Underhill (SBN 208211)
Tiffany F. Lim (SBN 260073)
SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.
One Montgomery, Suite 2700
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
C. Crews Townsend (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Thomas E. Hayes (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
MILLER & MARTIN PLLC
Suite 1000, Volunteer Building
832 Georgia Avenue
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2289
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14

Laura Ashby (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
MILLER & MARTIN PLLC
1170 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 800
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

15
Attorneys for Defendant Chattem, Inc.
16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

20

JOANNE ARROYO, on behalf of herself and
all other similarly situated,

21
Plaintiff,
22
v.
23
CHATTEM, INC.

Case No. 3:12-cv-02129-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
RELEVANT CASE MANAGEMENT
DEADLINES PURSUANT TO LOCAL
RULE 6-2

24
Defendant.
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02129-CRB

233941 V1

Case3:12-cv-02129-CRB Document21 Filed07/05/12 Page2 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

Whereas, on April 27, 2012, plaintiff Joanne Arroyo (“Plaintiff”) filed her Class Action
Complaint against Defendant Chattem, Inc. (“Defendant”);
Whereas, on May 22, 2012, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Class Action
Complaint;
Whereas, on June 29, 2012, the Court heard argument from counsel and granted Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss with leave for Plaintiff to amend her complaint within thirty-five days;

7

Whereas, the parties have agreed, subject to the Court’s approval, to continue the Initial Case

8

Management Conference, currently set for August 3, 2012 to November 9, 2012, or such other later

9

date as is convenient to the Court;

10
11
12
13

Whereas, the parties respectfully submit that the requested continuance is necessary to allow
time for Plaintiff to amend her complaint, and for Defendant to file a responsive pleading.
Whereas, no other time modifications have been made to this case, whether by stipulation or
Court order.

14

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, the parties to this action, by and

15

through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the currently scheduled case

16

management conference and the following case management deadlines be continued, subject to the

17

Court’s approval, as follows:

18

1. The deadline for the parties to conduct the Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(f) conference is

19

continued to October 10, 2012;

20

2. The Joint Case Management Statement is due on November 2, 2012; and

21

3. The Initial Case Management Conference, currently set for August 3, 2012, at 8:30 a.m.,

22

is reset for November 9, 2012, at 8:30 a.m.

23
24

Dated: July 5, 2012

REESE RICHMAN LLP

25
By: __/s/ Michael R. Reese_________
Michael R. Reese

26
27

Counsel for Plaintiff
Joanne Arroyo

28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02129-CRB

233941 V1

Case3:12-cv-02129-CRB Document21 Filed07/05/12 Page3 of 3

1

Dated: July 5, 2012

SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P.

2
By: ___/s/ M. Kevin Underhill____
M. Kevin Underhill

3
4

Counsel for Defendant
Chattem, Inc.

5
6

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

8

S

July 9 , 2012

UNIT
ED

Dated:

RT
U
O

United States District Court Judge

RT

13

J

ER

H

14
15

. Breyer

arles R
udge Ch

NO

12

R NIA

11

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

FO

10

LI

9

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

7

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER; CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02129-CRB

233941 V1