Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al

Filing 116

ORDER GRANTING 115 Stipulation RE: Motion to Supplement Administrative Records and Memorandum in Support. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/1/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-02172-JSW Document115 Filed02/01/13 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division MARTHA C. MANN JASON A. HILL Trial Attorneys United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 7600 Washington, D.C. 20044 Tel: (202) 514-2664 (Mann) (202) 305-0506 (Hill) Fax: (202) 514-8865 Email: martha.mann@usdoj.gov jason.hill2@usdoj.gov ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 11 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB, WILLITS ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INFORMATION CENTER, Plaintiffs, CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, 21 22 STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AND PLAINTIFFINTERVENOR’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND ORDER THEREON Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Case No. No. CV 12-2172 JSW 23 24 25 26 27 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MALCOLM DOUGHERTY, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Transportation, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, HEARING DATE: February 22, 2013 TIME: 9:00 a.m. COURTROOM: 11 JUDGE: Hon. Jeffrey S. White Defendants. 28 STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AND PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CV 12-2172 JSW Case3:12-cv-02172-JSW Document115 Filed02/01/13 Page2 of 5 1 Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity, Sierra Club, Willits Environmental Center and 2 Environmental Protection Information Center (“Plaintiffs”), Plaintiff-Intervenor California Farm 3 Bureau Federation (“Farm Bureau”), and Defendants the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“the 4 Corps”) have conferred and resolved the Plaintiffs’ and Farm Bureau’s pending Motion to Supplement 5 the Administrative Record (“Motion to Supplement”) (ECF No. 107), as that motion pertains to the 6 Corps’ administrative record. Plaintiffs, Farm Bureau, and the Corps report the following to the Court: 7 1. The Corps, having reviewed the documents provided by Plaintiffs and Farm Bureau that 8 are described in Exhibit 6 to the Motion to Supplement (ECF No. 107-2), agrees that the following 9 documents were inadvertently omitted from the Corps’ administrative record: 10 11 Documents 1, 3-6, 8-13, 15, 18, 20-21, 23, 25-29, 31-35, 37-43, 45-49, 52-56, 59-62, 64-69, 7276, 78, 80-88, 92, 94-96, 99, 101-103, 105-108, 110-114, 116, 122, 128, 130, 132, 134-142. 12 The Corps will electronically file a notice of lodging the amended administrative record 13 together with a certification of the amended administrative record and revised index. The Corps will 14 also lodge with the Court and provide to all parties a bates-stamped copy of the supplemental record 15 documents as expeditiously as possible.1 16 2. Plaintiffs and Farm Bureau, upon conferral with the Corps as to the remaining documents 17 listed in Exhibit 6 to the Motion to Supplement, agree to withdraw their motion as to all documents 18 listed in Exhibit 6 to the Motion to Supplement that are not described in Paragraph 1, i.e., all remaining 19 documents. 20 3. In light of this stipulation, Plaintiffs, Farm Bureau, and the Corps all agree that there is no 21 need for a hearing on the Motion to Supplement regarding the Corps’ administrative record, and the 22 Motion to Supplement may be denied as moot with respect to the Corps’ administrative record. 23 24 25 In light of their size, the parties have agreed that specific “shaping” files included as an attachment to Document 21 will be made available to any party upon request. 1 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AND PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CV 12-2172 JSW Page 1 Case3:12-cv-02172-JSW Document115 Filed02/01/13 Page3 of 5 1 Dated: February 1, 2013 2 3 4 5 6 7 /s/ Aruna Prabhala Aruna Prabhala (Cal. Bar No. 278865) CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 351 California Street, Suite 600 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 436-9682 x 322 Facsimile: (415) 436-9683 aprabhala@biologicaldiversity.org akeats@biologicaldiversity.org Attorney for Plaintiffs /s/ Jack L. Rice _____________________ KARI E. FISHER, SBN 245447 JACK L. RICE, SBN 248778 CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION 2300 River Plaza Drive Sacramento, CA 95833 Telephone: (916) 561-5665 Facsimile: (916) 561-5691 kfisher@cfbf.com jrice@cfbf.com Attorneys for Plaintiff -Intervenor CALIFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division /s/ Martha C. Mann MARTHA C. MANN JASON A. HILL United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 7600 Washington, D.C. 20044 Telephone: (202) 514-2664 (Mann) (202) 305-0506 (Hill) Facsimile: (202) 514-8865 martha.mann@usdoj.gov jason.hill2@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AND PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CV 12-2172 JSW Page 2 Case3:12-cv-02172-JSW Document115 Filed02/01/13 Page4 of 5 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: February 1 , 2013 . DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ AND PLAINTIFF-INTERVENOR’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CV 12-2172 JSW Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?