Clements v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Filing
23
ORDER GRANTING re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Stay Case Pending Mediation and to Set Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. The case management conference set for 8/31/12 at 1:30 PM shall remain on calendar as scheduled. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/9/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Peter Obstler (SBN 171623)
peter.obstler@bingham.com
Zachary J. Alinder (SBN 209009)
zachary.alinder@bingham.com
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: 415.393.2000
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
Shana E. Scarlett (SBN 217895)
shanas@hbsslaw.com
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: 510.725.3000
Facsimile: 510.725.3001
Attorneys for Defendant
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
7
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
Steve W. Berman, pro hac vice
steve@hbsslaw.com
Thomas E. Loeser (SBN 202724)
toml@hbsslaw.com
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 330
Seattle, WA 981010
Telephone: 206.623.7292
Facsimile: 206.623.0594
8
9
10
11
12
LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN
Peter B. Fredman (SBN 189097)
peter@peterfredmanlaw.com
125 University Ave., Suite 102
Berkeley, CA 94710
Telephone: 510.868.2626
Facsimile: 510.868.2627
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Shelly A. Clements
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
21
22
23
24
25
26
SHELLY A. CLEMENTS, on behalf of herself
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
Case No. C 12-02179 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY
CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND
TO SET TIME TO RESPOND TO
MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendant.
27
28
Case No. C 12-02179 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS, NO. C 12-02179 JCS
1
Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase” or “Defendant”) and Plaintiff Shelly A.
2
Clements (“Plaintiff”) (together with Defendant, the “Parties”) respectfully submit the following
3
Joint Stipulation to Stay the Case Pending Mediation and Set Time to Respond to Motion to
4
Dismiss.
5
6
WHEREAS, on May 23, 2012, the Court issued an order setting the schedule for Chase to
respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “May 23, 2012 Order”), ECF No. 20;
7
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s May 23, 2012 Order, Plaintiff’s opposition to
8
Chase’s motion to dismiss is currently due August 14, 2012 and Chase’s reply in support of its
9
motion to dismiss is currently due September 3, 2012;
10
11
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and agreed to participate in mediation of
the dispute beginning on July 5, 2012 before David Geronemus;
12
WHEREAS, the Parties have further agreed that subsequent mediation sessions will
13
occur on August 23 and August 24, 2012, and that the mediation will continue until either Party
14
or the mediator declares the mediation terminated by written correspondence;
15
WHEREAS, after conferring in good faith, the Parties have agreed, subject to court
16
approval, that mediation prior to the further expenditure of additional time and resources of the
17
Parties and the Court would be helpful in attempting to reach an early resolution of the Action;
18
and,
19
WHEREAS, the Parties accordingly stipulate and agree that the case should be stayed
20
pending private mediation, which will begin on July 5, 2012, that Plaintiff’s opposition to
21
Chase’s motion to dismiss will be due 30 days after the termination of the mediation, and that
22
Chase’s reply in support of its motion to dismiss will be due 20 days after Plaintiff’s filing of her
23
opposition.
24
25
26
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, AND RESPECTFULLY
REQUESTED AS FOLLOWS:
The case shall be stayed pending the Parties’ mediation. Parties shall engage in
27
mediation beginning on July 5, 2012 in front of David Geronemus, with subsequent sessions
28
planned on August 23-24, 2012. If any Party and/or the selected mediator informs the Court that
1
Case No. C 12-02179 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS, NO. C 12-02179 JCS
1
the mediation was unsuccessful and terminated, Plaintiff shall file her opposition to Chase’s
2
motion to dismiss within 30 days after the filing of such a termination notice with the Court and
3
Chase will fill its reply in support of the motion to dismiss within 20 days after Plaintiff’s filing
4
of her opposition.
5
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
DATED: July 2, 2012
Bingham McCutchen LLP
7
By:
8
/s/ Zachary J. Alinder
Peter Obstler
Zachary J. Alinder
Attorneys for Defendant
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
9
10
11
DATED: July 2, 2012
LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN
12
13
By:
14
/s/ Peter Fredman
Peter Fredman
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Shelly A. Clements
15
16
17
18
19
S
July 9, 2012
Dated: _______________
. Spero
Joseph C
NO
25
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
IFIE
D
AS MO
R NIA
UNIT
ED
24
RT
U
O
23
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
Honorable Judge
Joseph C. Spero
United States District Magistrate Judge
E
RT
26
H
27
FO
22
LI
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED . IT IS HEREBY FURTHER
ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference set for 8/31/12 at 1:30 PM shall
remain on calendar as scheduled.
RN
A
20
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
28
2
Case No. C 12-02179 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS, NO. C 12-02179 JCS
1
2
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I, Zachary J. Alinder, attest under penalty of
3
perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from all of the
4
signatories.
5
Dated: July 2, 2012
/s/ Zachary J. Alinder
Zachary J. Alinder
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. C 12-02179 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS, NO. C 12-02179 JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?