Clements v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING re 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Stay Case Pending Mediation and to Set Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. The case management conference set for 8/31/12 at 1:30 PM shall remain on calendar as scheduled. Signed, as modified, by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/9/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP Peter Obstler (SBN 171623) peter.obstler@bingham.com Zachary J. Alinder (SBN 209009) zachary.alinder@bingham.com Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067 Telephone: 415.393.2000 Facsimile: 415.393.2286 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Shana E. Scarlett (SBN 217895) shanas@hbsslaw.com 715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: 510.725.3000 Facsimile: 510.725.3001 Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 7 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Steve W. Berman, pro hac vice steve@hbsslaw.com Thomas E. Loeser (SBN 202724) toml@hbsslaw.com 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 330 Seattle, WA 981010 Telephone: 206.623.7292 Facsimile: 206.623.0594 8 9 10 11 12 LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN Peter B. Fredman (SBN 189097) peter@peterfredmanlaw.com 125 University Ave., Suite 102 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: 510.868.2626 Facsimile: 510.868.2627 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff Shelly A. Clements 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 22 23 24 25 26 SHELLY A. CLEMENTS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Case No. C 12-02179 JCS JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. 27 28 Case No. C 12-02179 JCS JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS, NO. C 12-02179 JCS 1 Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase” or “Defendant”) and Plaintiff Shelly A. 2 Clements (“Plaintiff”) (together with Defendant, the “Parties”) respectfully submit the following 3 Joint Stipulation to Stay the Case Pending Mediation and Set Time to Respond to Motion to 4 Dismiss. 5 6 WHEREAS, on May 23, 2012, the Court issued an order setting the schedule for Chase to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint (the “May 23, 2012 Order”), ECF No. 20; 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s May 23, 2012 Order, Plaintiff’s opposition to 8 Chase’s motion to dismiss is currently due August 14, 2012 and Chase’s reply in support of its 9 motion to dismiss is currently due September 3, 2012; 10 11 WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and agreed to participate in mediation of the dispute beginning on July 5, 2012 before David Geronemus; 12 WHEREAS, the Parties have further agreed that subsequent mediation sessions will 13 occur on August 23 and August 24, 2012, and that the mediation will continue until either Party 14 or the mediator declares the mediation terminated by written correspondence; 15 WHEREAS, after conferring in good faith, the Parties have agreed, subject to court 16 approval, that mediation prior to the further expenditure of additional time and resources of the 17 Parties and the Court would be helpful in attempting to reach an early resolution of the Action; 18 and, 19 WHEREAS, the Parties accordingly stipulate and agree that the case should be stayed 20 pending private mediation, which will begin on July 5, 2012, that Plaintiff’s opposition to 21 Chase’s motion to dismiss will be due 30 days after the termination of the mediation, and that 22 Chase’s reply in support of its motion to dismiss will be due 20 days after Plaintiff’s filing of her 23 opposition. 24 25 26 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED AS FOLLOWS: The case shall be stayed pending the Parties’ mediation. Parties shall engage in 27 mediation beginning on July 5, 2012 in front of David Geronemus, with subsequent sessions 28 planned on August 23-24, 2012. If any Party and/or the selected mediator informs the Court that 1 Case No. C 12-02179 JCS JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS, NO. C 12-02179 JCS 1 the mediation was unsuccessful and terminated, Plaintiff shall file her opposition to Chase’s 2 motion to dismiss within 30 days after the filing of such a termination notice with the Court and 3 Chase will fill its reply in support of the motion to dismiss within 20 days after Plaintiff’s filing 4 of her opposition. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 DATED: July 2, 2012 Bingham McCutchen LLP 7 By: 8 /s/ Zachary J. Alinder Peter Obstler Zachary J. Alinder Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. 9 10 11 DATED: July 2, 2012 LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN 12 13 By: 14 /s/ Peter Fredman Peter Fredman Attorneys for Plaintiff Shelly A. Clements 15 16 17 18 19 S July 9, 2012 Dated: _______________ . Spero Joseph C NO 25 ERED O ORD D IT IS S IFIE D AS MO R NIA UNIT ED 24 RT U O 23 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T Honorable Judge Joseph C. Spero United States District Magistrate Judge E RT 26 H 27 FO 22 LI 21 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED . IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Case Management Conference set for 8/31/12 at 1:30 PM shall remain on calendar as scheduled. RN A 20 F D IS T IC T O R C 28 2 Case No. C 12-02179 JCS JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS, NO. C 12-02179 JCS 1 2 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I, Zachary J. Alinder, attest under penalty of 3 perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from all of the 4 signatories. 5 Dated: July 2, 2012 /s/ Zachary J. Alinder Zachary J. Alinder 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. C 12-02179 JCS JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS, NO. C 12-02179 JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?