DeGarmo v. Secretary of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al

Filing 4

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 06/04/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 No. C-12-2194 TEH (PR) RAYMOND DEGARMO, 12 Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL 13 14 15 16 v. SECRETARY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Respondents. 17 / 18 19 The Clerk of the Court erroneously opened this case when 20 Petitioner, a state prisoner incarcerated at La Palma Correctional 21 Center in Eloy, Arizona, filed a document entitled, “Petition for a 22 Writ of Habeas Corpus,” which is related to his other pending 23 action, DeGarmo v. Secretary of California Dep’t of Corrections and 24 Rehabiliation, No. C 11-4859 TEH (PR). 25 other pending action is a habeas action that challenges his 2009 26 judgment of conviction from Contra Costa County Superior Court. 27 petition filed in the present case is a copy of the petition filed 28 in the other action; the only difference is that Petitioner has Specifically, Petitioner’s The 1 updated the petition to name as respondent the warden of his current 2 place of incarceration, La Palma Correctional Center, and removed as 3 respondent the warden of his former place of incarceration, North 4 Fork Correctional Facility. 5 See Doc. #1 at 1-2. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED because it was opened 6 in error. 7 deny all pending motions as moot. 8 No filing fee is due. The Clerk shall close the file and IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 DATED United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 06/04/2012 THELTON E. HENDERSON United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 G:\PRO-SE\TEH\HC.12\Degarmo-12-2194-dismissal-opened-in-error.wpd 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?