DeGarmo v. Secretary of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
Filing
4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 06/04/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
No. C-12-2194 TEH (PR)
RAYMOND DEGARMO,
12
Petitioner,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
13
14
15
16
v.
SECRETARY OF CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Respondents.
17
/
18
19
The Clerk of the Court erroneously opened this case when
20
Petitioner, a state prisoner incarcerated at La Palma Correctional
21
Center in Eloy, Arizona, filed a document entitled, “Petition for a
22
Writ of Habeas Corpus,” which is related to his other pending
23
action, DeGarmo v. Secretary of California Dep’t of Corrections and
24
Rehabiliation, No. C 11-4859 TEH (PR).
25
other pending action is a habeas action that challenges his 2009
26
judgment of conviction from Contra Costa County Superior Court.
27
petition filed in the present case is a copy of the petition filed
28
in the other action; the only difference is that Petitioner has
Specifically, Petitioner’s
The
1
updated the petition to name as respondent the warden of his current
2
place of incarceration, La Palma Correctional Center, and removed as
3
respondent the warden of his former place of incarceration, North
4
Fork Correctional Facility.
5
See Doc. #1 at 1-2.
Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED because it was opened
6
in error.
7
deny all pending motions as moot.
8
No filing fee is due.
The Clerk shall close the file and
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
DATED
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
06/04/2012
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
G:\PRO-SE\TEH\HC.12\Degarmo-12-2194-dismissal-opened-in-error.wpd
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?