Hicks v. Neal et al

Filing 11

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 10 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/24/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

MICHAEL J. HICKS,

9

Plaintiff,

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 12-2207 SI (pr)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION

v.
LINDA NEAL; et al.,
Defendants.
/

13
14

Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the order denying his request for a preliminary

15

injunction is DENIED. (Docket # 10.) Plaintiff has not presented newly discovered evidence,

16

showed that the court committed clear error, or identified an intervening change in the law that

17

affects this case. See McDowell v. Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir. 1999) (en banc).

18

The court also rejects plaintiff' request (on page 4 of his motion) that the court invite attorney

19

Bien and Dr. Metzner to contact the court for an ex parte communication.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 24, 2012

_______________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge