Hicks v. Neal et al

Filing 29

ORDER 28 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MICHAEL J. HICKS, 9 Plaintiff, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 No. C 12-2207 SI (pr) ORDER v. LINDA NEAL; et al., 12 Defendants. / 13 14 Plaintiff filed a motion to quash or modify subpoenas issued by defendant Kulka (Docket 15 # 23) and the court set a briefing schedule on the motion. Plaintiff then filed another motion to 16 quash or modify a subpoena issued by defendant Neal (Docket # 26). Plaintiff also filed a 17 "plaintiff's supplemental to motion to quash" (Docket # 27) that may apply to one or both of his 18 motions to quash. 19 The court prefers to consider the discovery disputes at the same time. Defendant Kulka's 20 motion for an extension of the time to file his opposition is GRANTED. (Docket # 28.) The 21 court vacates the existing briefing schedule for the motion with regard to the Kulka subpoenas 22 and sets the following new briefing schedule for both motions to quash: 23 1. Defendants must file and serve their oppositions no later than January 31, 2013. 24 2. Plaintiff must file and serve on each defense counsel his reply brief (if any) no 25 26 27 28 later than February 15, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 15, 2013 _______________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?