Mendoza v. Lightning Van Lines, Inc. et al

Filing 23

ORDER DENYING 22 PARTIES' STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 18, 2012.(mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 JORGE MENDOZA and REYNALDO ESCOBEDO, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 No. C 12-2215 MMC ORDER DENYING PARTIES’ STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY AND MOTION DEADLINES v. 13 LIGHTNING VANS LINES, INC., et al, 14 Defendants. / 15 16 Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Discovery and Motion 17 Deadlines, filed December 14, 2012. The proposed dates, however, do not take into 18 consideration the dates remaining as initially set. In particular, under the proposed 19 schedule, the hearing on dispositive motions would take place on June 14, 2013, see Civil 20 L.R. 7-2 (a), 3 days after the date on which the parties’ pretrial filings are due in connection 21 with the Pretrial Conference. (See Pretrial Preparation Order, filed Aug. 18, 2012 at 2 22 (scheduling Pretrial Conference for June 25, 2013); Pretrial Instructions, filed Aug. 18, 2012 23 at 3, 5 (directing parties to file joint Pretrial Statement and motions in limine “no later than 24 ten court days prior to the date set for the Pretrial Conference”) (emphasis in original).) 25 Accordingly, the motion is hereby DENIED. 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 Dated: December 18, 2012 28 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?