U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Genesco, Inc.

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 33 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE filed by Genesco, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 2, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO – #084965 (CA)
MARCIA MITCHELL- #18122 (WA)
DEBRA A. SMITH – #147863 (CA)
UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
San Francisco District Office
350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500
San Francisco, California 94105-1260
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff EEOC
ERIC MECKLEY, State Bar No. 168181
KATHRYN M. NAZARIAN, State Bar No. 259392
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant GENESCO, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17

U. S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiffs,

18
19
20
21

Case No. CV 12-2220 JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE

vs.
GENESCO, INC.,
Defendant.

22
23
24
25
26
27
M ORGAN , L EW IS &
B OCK IUS LLP
ATTO RNEYS AT LAW
S A N F R A N C I SC O

28

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. CV 12-2220 JST

1
2
3

STIPULATION
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action, Plaintiff United

4

States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“Commission” or “EEOC”) and Defendant

5

Genesco, Inc. (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), through their respective counsel of

6

record, that the above-captioned action be and hereby is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice,

7

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

8
9

The terms of the consent decree entered by the Court on June 18, 2013 (Court Docket No.
31) have been satisfied in full by the Parties, Genesco has substantially complied with its

10

obligations under the consent decree, and pursuant to its terms the consent decree has, and now is,

11

expired. As a result, the Court will no longer retain jurisdiction over the Parties in this Action.

12
13
14
15
16
17

The Parties shall bear their own respective attorneys’ fees and costs of suit incurred in
connection with this Action and its dismissal.
All parties that have appeared in this action have consented and agreed to the dismissal
with prejudice pursuant to this Stipulation.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: August 31, 2015

18

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION

19
By //s// Marcia L. Mitchell
Marcia Mitchell
Attorney for Plaintiff EEOC

20
21
22

Dated: August 31, 2015

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

23
24
25
26

By /s/ Kathryn M. Nazarian
Kathryn M. Nazarian
Attorneys for Defendant
GENESCO, INC.

27
28
M ORGAN , L EW IS &
B OCK IUS LLP
ATTO RNEYS AT LAW
S A N F R A N C I SC O

1
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. CV 12-2220 JST

1
FILER’S ATTESTATION
2
3
4

I, Kathryn M. Nazarian, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being
used to file the Stipulation for Dismissal of Action With Prejudice. In compliance with Local
Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that Marcia Mitchell concurs in this filing.

5

/s/ Kathryn M. Nazarian
Kathryn M. Nazarian
Attorneys for Defendant
GENESCO, INC.

6
7
8
9
10
11

[PROPOSED] ORDER

12
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ER

21

R NIA

. Ti ga r

FO

nS
J u d ge J o

H

20

RT

19

O OR
IT IS S JUDGE
US DISTRICT

NO

18

HON. JON S. TIGAR RED
DE

LI

17

________________________________

UNIT
ED

16

Dated: _______________________
September 2, 2015

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

15

S

14

A

13

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
M ORGAN , L EW IS &
B OCK IUS LLP
ATTO RNEYS AT LAW
S A N F R A N C I SC O

2
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Case No. CV 12-2220 JST