Patacsil et al v. Countrywide KB Home Loans et al

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/2/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 7 8 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 9 Plaintiffs, v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 12-2304 RS EDWARD PATACSIL and NELL STERLING PATACSIL, COUNTRYWIDE KB HOMES, et. al., 12 Defendants. ____________________________________/ 13 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in federal court on May 8, 2012. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), plaintiffs were required to serve defendants within 120 days. The deadline for service may be extended if plaintiffs can show good cause for why service has not been timely effectuated. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m). Accordingly, on September 21, 2012 plaintiffs were directed to file a written response by October 1, 2012 explaining why defendants had not yet been served. The order stated that a failure to respond would result in dismissal of the action. Plaintiffs have not 19 responded to that order. Thus, this action is dismissed, without prejudice. 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: 10/2/12 24 25 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO: Edward and Nell Sterling Patacsil 692 San Juan Oaks Road Brentwood, CA 94513 DATED: 10/2/12 /s/ Chambers Staff Chambers of Judge Richard Seeborg 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?