Gomez v. Lewis
Filing
9
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge William Alsup granting 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
No. C 12-2338 WHA (PR)
JORGE A. GOMEZ,
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
AND SETTING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Petitioner,
v.
G. LEWIS, Warden,
(Dkt. 8)
Respondent.
/
16
17
Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The
18
case was referred to the Federal Public Defender to find representation for petitioner. The
19
Federal Public Defender has filed a motion to appoint himself as counsel.
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Steven G. Kalar, Esq., Federal Public Defender for
21
the Northern District of California is appointed as counsel for petitioner in this matter pursuant
22
to 18 U.S.C. 3006A as counsel for petitioner.
23
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties, by counsel,
24
are hereby ordered to appear at a Case Management Conference before the undersigned on May
25
30, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 9, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San
26
Francisco, California, for the purpose of setting dates for briefing and oral argument. No later
27
than May 23, 2013, the parties shall file a joint case management statement pursuant to Civil
28
Local Rule 16-9.
1
2
3
The clerk shall add petitioner’s appointed counsel to the docket, and serve a copy of this
order upon counsel for both parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: March
5
, 2013.
5
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
G:\PRO-SE\WHA\HC.12\GOMEZ2338.APTCSL2.wpd
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?