Gomez v. Lewis

Filing 9

ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE by Judge William Alsup granting 8 Motion to Appoint Counsel (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 No. C 12-2338 WHA (PR) JORGE A. GOMEZ, ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL AND SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Petitioner, v. G. LEWIS, Warden, (Dkt. 8) Respondent. / 16 17 Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The 18 case was referred to the Federal Public Defender to find representation for petitioner. The 19 Federal Public Defender has filed a motion to appoint himself as counsel. 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Steven G. Kalar, Esq., Federal Public Defender for 21 the Northern District of California is appointed as counsel for petitioner in this matter pursuant 22 to 18 U.S.C. 3006A as counsel for petitioner. 23 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties, by counsel, 24 are hereby ordered to appear at a Case Management Conference before the undersigned on May 25 30, 2013 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 9, 19th Floor, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San 26 Francisco, California, for the purpose of setting dates for briefing and oral argument. No later 27 than May 23, 2013, the parties shall file a joint case management statement pursuant to Civil 28 Local Rule 16-9. 1 2 3 The clerk shall add petitioner’s appointed counsel to the docket, and serve a copy of this order upon counsel for both parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: March 5 , 2013. 5 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 G:\PRO-SE\WHA\HC.12\GOMEZ2338.APTCSL2.wpd 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?