Platte River Insurance Company v. Dignity Health

Filing 31

ORDER RESETTING CMC TO 1/17/13 AT 9:00 A.M. Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/8/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP BARRY S. LANDSBERG (Bar No. CA 117284) E-mail: blandsberg@manatt.com SUSAN PAGE WHITE (State Bar No. 137125) E-mail: spwhite@manatt.com 11355 West Olympic Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90064-1614 Telephone: (310) 312-4000 Facsimile: (310) 312-4224 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP AMY B. BRIGGS (Bar No. CA 194028) E-mail: abriggs@manatt.com AMANDA M. KNUDSEN (Bar No. CA 252752) E-mail: aknudsen@manatt.com One Embarcadero Center, 30th Floor Telephone: (415) 291-7400 Facsimile: (415) 291-7474 10 11 Attorneys for Defendant DIGNITY HEALTH f/k/a Catholic Healthcare West d/b/a Mercy General Hospital 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 vs. DIGNITY HEALTH f/k/a CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST d/b/a MERCY GENERAL HOSPITAL, Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO Case No. C 12-02356 EMC Case No. 3:12-cv-02369 EMC JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING CMC Date: November 14, 2012 Time: 9:30 a.m. Location: San Francisco Courthouse, Courtroom 5, 17th Floor Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen RELATED CASE: ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. DIGNITY HEALTH f/k/a Catholic Healthcare West, a California corporation, and MERCY GENERAL HOSPITAL, a California corporation, Defendants JOINT CMC STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NOS. C 12-02356 EMC AND 3:12-CV-02369 EMC 1 The parties to the above-entitled related actions jointly submit this JOINT CASE 2 MANAGEMENT STATEMENT & PROPOSED ORDER pursuant to the Standing Order for All 3 Judges of the Northern District of California dated July 1, 2011 and Civil Local Rule 16-9. These 4 above-captioned insurance coverage actions (the “Arch action” and the “Platte River action;” 5 collectively, the “Platte River/Arch Action”) are currently stayed pursuant to the Court’s August 6 16, 2012 Order on the parties’ Joint Stipulation Re: Stay of Action. The Platte River/Arch Action 7 relates to insurance coverage for an underlying wrongful termination lawsuit against Dignity, 8 entitled Chopourian v. Catholic Healthcare West, et al., United States District Court, Eastern 9 District of California, Case No. 2:09-cv-02972-KJM-KJN (the “Chopourian lawsuit”). 10 As the Court may recall, the parties had requested, and the Court granted, the Stay due to 11 the fact that the even though a jury verdict had been reached in the Chopourian lawsuit against 12 Dignity, Dignity was in the process of pursuing post-trial motions and, if necessary, an appeal of 13 the judgment. Undersigned counsel for Dignity advises that Judge Kimberly J. Muller heard oral 14 argument on Dignity’s post-trial motions in the Chopourian lawsuit on October 25, 2012, and 15 requested additional briefing from the parties, which was submitted on November 2, 2012. 16 Undersigned counsel for Dignity represents that on November 5, 2012, before Judge 17 Muller ruled on the post-trial motions, the parties to the Chopourian action reached a settlement 18 in principle in that lawsuit. Counsel for Dignity represents that the parties to the Chopourian 19 action are now in the process of committing the settlement to writing. Counsel for Dignity 20 represents that while the settlement is confidential, there are some material terms and conditions 21 that need to be worked out between the parties, which they have 45 days to do. Thus, counsel for 22 Dignity advises that, at this time, a settlement agreement has not yet been finalized and signed by 23 all parties to the Chopourian action and that lawsuit remains pending and has not yet been 24 dismissed. 25 Pursuant to the Stay in this action, the stay can be lifted through a stipulation by the 26 parties, and approval by the Court. Alternatively, one party can seek to lift the stay upon 30 days 27 notice. Neither method to lift the Stay has been implemented by the parties at this time. In light 28 of this and the fact that, according to counsel for Dignity, the Chopourian settlement is still being 2 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO JOINT CMC STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NOS. C 12-02356 EMC AND 3:12-CV-02369 EMC 1 finalized, the parties believe it is premature to address most of the issues in the Joint Case 2 Management Statement, including (1) jurisdiction and service; (2) the factual and legal issues; (3) 3 amendments to the pleadings; (4) the parties’ Initial Disclosures; (5) discovery-related issues; (6) 4 settlement; (7) whether the case is suitable to be resolved through another means; and (8) trial 5 scheduling and trial issues. 6 As to the remaining issues, the parties herein respond as follows: 7 1. 8 The parties are committed to preserving all evidence relevant to the Platte River/Arch Action; 9 2. The parties have declined to consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge; 10 3. Certifications of Interested Parties have been submitted by the parties. 11 Based upon the above, the parties request a continuance of the Case Management 12 13 14 Conference for 45 days. However, nothing in this Statement precludes any party from seeking to lift the Stay at any time. 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 17 Dated: November 7, 2012 TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 18 19 BY: 20 21 22 Dated: November 7, 2012 /s/ Terrence R. McInnis Terrence R. McInnis Attorneys for Plaintiff PLATTE RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY SEDGWICK LLP 23 24 25 26 BY: /s/ Nicholas J. Boos Nicholas J. Boos Attorneys for Plaintiff ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY 27 28 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO 3 JOINT CMC STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NOS. C 12-02356 EMC AND 3:12-CV-02369 EMC 1 Dated: November 7, 2012 MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP 2 3 BY: /s/ Amanda M. Knudsen Amanda M. Knudsen Attorneys for Defendant DIGNITY HEALTH f/k/a Catholic Healthcare West d/b/a Mercy General Hospital 4 5 6 7 8 Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Amanda M. Knudsen hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 9 10 11 ORDER 12 shall be filed by January 10, 2013. 15 S ard M. NO 20 O IT IS S DIFIED AS MO RT 21 ER H 22 dw Judge E 23 Chen LI 19 By:_____________________________________________ E Judge of the United StatesD ORDER District Court A 18 8 Dated: November ___, 2012 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 16 R NIA 14 Pursuant to the parties request above, the Case Management Conference is continued to January 17, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. December __, 2012, at ______ a.m. in Courtroom 5. An updated joint CMC statement FO 13 N F D IS T IC T O R C 24 25 26 27 28 M ANATT , P HELPS & P HILLIPS , LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SAN FRA NCI SCO 305448813.2 4 JOINT CMC STATEMENT AND PROPOSED ORDER CASE NOS. C 12-02356 EMC AND 3:12-CV-02369 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?