Allen v. Bayshore Mall et al

Filing 106

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 86 Joint MOTION for Summary Judgment Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or in the Alternative Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by Bayshore Mall; 87 MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Adjudication filed by Jessica Allen. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 11, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JESSICA ALLEN, Case No. 12-cv-02368-JST Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 BAYSHORE MALL, et al., Defendants. ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Re: Dkt. Nos. 86, 87 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 86, 87. Pursuant to 13 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’ 14 briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the motions suitable for disposition without 15 oral argument. The hearing on the motions, currently scheduled for March 20, 2014, is hereby 16 VACATED. 17 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 18 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 19 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 20 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 21 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 22 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 23 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 11, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?