Weiss v. Vidyo, Inc. et al

Filing 28

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED; AND, IF THE CASES ARE DEEMED NOT RELATED, TO RESET THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE. The deadline for filing defendants' opposition to plaintiff's Motion to Remand is extended to June 20, 2012. The deadline for filing plaintiff's reply is extended to June 29, 2012. The hearing on plaintiff's Motion to Remand remains as scheduled on July 13, 2012. The deadline for filing defendants' rep ly in support of defendants' Motion to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration is extended to June 20, 2012. The hearing on defendants' Motion to Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration is continued to July 27, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 21, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

JULIE WEISS,
Plaintiff,

12
v.

13
14

VIDYO, INC., ASHISH GUPTA, and DOES 1
through 10,

15
16

No. C 12-2391 MMC
ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
CLARIFICATION WHETHER CASES
ARE RELATED; AND, IF THE CASES
ARE DEEMED NOT RELATED, TO
RESET BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Defendants.

/

17
Before the Court is defendants’ “Motion for Clarification Whether Cases are Related;
18
and, if the Cases are Deemed Not Related, to Reset Briefing Schedule,” filed June 18,
19
2012. Plaintiff has filed opposition thereto. Having read and considered the papers filed in
20
support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.
21
Given the procedural history of the above-titled action, the Court finds good cause
22

has been shown to modify the briefing schedules on pending motions as set forth below:1

23
1. The deadline for filing defendants’ opposition to plaintiff’s Motion to Remand is
24
hereby EXTENDED to June 20, 2012, and the deadline for filing plaintiff’s reply is hereby
25
EXTENDED to June 29, 2012; the hearing on the motion remains as scheduled on July 13,
26
27
1

28

In light of Magistrate Judge Cousins’ recent order vacating his order relating the
above-titled action to Case No. 11-5663, defendants’ request for clarification is hereby
DENIED as moot.

1

2012.

2

2. The deadline for filing defendants’ reply in support of defendants’ Motion to

3

Dismiss and to Compel Arbitration is hereby EXTENDED to June 20, 2012, and the hearing

4

on said motion is CONTINUED to July 27, 2012.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: June 21, 2012
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2