Bonshahi v. Fedex Corporation et al

Filing 5

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BEHRUZ BONSHAHI, an individual,

11
12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX
OFFICE AND PRINT SERVICES, INC.,
CABRITA FRANCISCO, EMILY TRE,
and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT FEDEX
CORPORATION TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

MAO. JUDGE:
COURTRM:

Hon. Maria-Elena James
B

CASE FILED:
TRIAL DATE:

May 15, 2012
No Date Set

Defendants.

16
17

ORDER

18
19

CASE NO. CV 122471 MEJ

Pursuant to the Joint Motion for Extension of Time for Defendant FEDEX

20

CORPORATION to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint, the Court finds good cause appears to

21

grant Defendant FEDEX CORPORATION until on or before June 27, 2012, to file its response

22

to Plaintiffs Complaint.

23
24

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant FEDEX CORPORATION’S responsive
pleading to Plaintiffs Complaint is to be served and filed on or before June 27, 2012.

25
DATED:
26

June 13, 2012

By:
HONORABLE MARIA-ELENA JAMES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE
DISTRICT COURT

27
28
Woos, FLETCHER
MACK H.P
AflOjUflVS AT LAW

1075089.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. CV 12 2471 MEJ