Matchpoint Solutions v. Information Management Consulting, Inc. et al

Filing 9

ORDER; re 7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Information Management Consulting, Inc., Francis T. Khuong. Motion to Dismiss Hearing reset to 9/6/2012 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/9/2012. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/9/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ls, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

Northern District of California

10

San Francisco Division
MATCHPOINT SOLUTIONS, a California
corporation,

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

No. C 12-02472 LB
ORDER

Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16

v.
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
CONSULTING, INC., a Texas corporation,
and FRANCIS T. KHUONG, an individual,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/

17
18

On June 28, 2012, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss that appears not to comply with the

19

Civil Local Rules. First, the court observes that counsel for Defendants does not indicate that he is

20

an active member in good standing of the Bar of this court, as required by Civil Local Rule 11-1. If

21

counsel is not admitted to this Bar, he is directed to comply with Civil Local Rule 11-1 or 11-3,

22

whichever is applicable.

23

Second, Defendants’ motion does not comply with other Civil Local Rules governing the format

24

of pleadings, including L.R. 3-4(a), and 3-4(c). Third, the court directs Defendants to ensure that

25

they comply with this court’s Standing Order, available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lborders.

26

In future filings, Defendants are directed to comply with all applicable rules and orders.

27

Finally, Defendants’ motion does not comply with Civil Local Rule 7-2, which requires all

28

motions to be noticed on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days

C 12-02472

1

after service of the motion. Accordingly, the court sets the hearing on Defendants’ Motion to

2

Dismiss for September 6, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. If the parties agree, they may reschedule the hearing

3

for 11:00 a.m. on the first or third Thursday of any month, subject to any other applicable rules or

4

orders.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 9, 2012
_______________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

C 12-02472

2