Yee v. Lin

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR DFT LIN'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/15/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DANIEL J. WEINBERG (STATE BAR NO. 227159)
[e-mail]
ELIZABETH MCBRIDE (STATE BAR NO. 260577)
[e-mail]
MORVARID METANAT (STATE BAR NO. 268228)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
VERNA LIN.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13

ROBERT B. YEE, an individual,
Plaintiff,

14
15

v.

16

Defendant.

JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
CONTINUING DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT VERA LIN’S
RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT

VERNA LIN and DOES 1-5,

17

Case No. C-12-02474-JCS

Courtroom: G, 15th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Joseph C. Spero

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT
C 12-02474-JCS

1

Plaintiff Robert B. Yee (“Yee” or “Plaintiff”), on the one hand, and Defendant Verna Lin

2

(“Defendant” or “Lin”), on the other hand, through their respective counsel, HEREBY

3

STIPULATE and AGREE as follows:

4
5

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Complaint (“Complaint”) against Defendant in the
Northern District of California on May 15, 2012;

6

WHEREAS, Defendant was served with the Complaint on May 25, 2012.

7

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), Defendant’s response to

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

the Complaint is presently due no later than June 15, 2012;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed to a fourteen (14) day extension of the
deadline for Defendant to respond to the Complaint, from June 15, 2012 to June 29, 2012;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties have agreed and stipulated, through their respective
counsel of record, as follows:
(a)

Pursuant to L.R. 6-1(a), Defendant’s time to respond to the Complaint shall be

continued by fourteen (14) days;
(b)

Defendants’ response to the Complaint shall be due on or before June 29, 2012.

16
17

Dated: June 13, 2012

HOWARD L. SMUKLER

18
By:

19
20

/s/ Howard L. Smukler /s/
HOWARD L. SMUKLER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT B. YEE

21
22

Dated: June 13, 2012

ORRICK , HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP

23
By:

24
25

/s/ Morvarid Metanat /s/
MORVARID METANAT
Attorneys for Defendant
VERNA LIN

26
27
28
-1-

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT
C 12-02474-JCS

1
2

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, §X(B), I attest under penalty of
perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from its signatory.

3
4

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: June 13, 2012

5

ER

R NIA

Spero

H

11

RT

10

seph C.

Judge Jo

FO

Dated: June 15, 2012

NO

9

ERED

O ORD
IT IS S

A

8

/s/ Morvarid Metanat /s/
MORVARID METANAT

LI

UNIT
ED

7

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

6

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OHSUSA:750904933.1

-2-

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO
COMPLAINT
C 12-02474-JCS