STMicroelectronics,Inc., v. Invensense Inc.

Filing 56

ORDER GRANTING 54 STIPULATION CHANGING TIME FOR PATENT L.R. 3-2 DOCUMENT PRODUCTION ACCOMPANYING DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/22/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2012)

Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document54 Filed10/19/12 Page1 of 4

1 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
[e-mail]
2 Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032)
[e-mail]
3 Michelle A. Clark (Bar No. 243777)
[e-mail]
4 Lance Yang (Bar No. 260705)*
[e-mail]
5 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
6 San Francisco, California 94111-4788
Telephone:
[phone]
7 Facsimile:
[phone]
8 Michael Powell (Bar No. 202850)
[e-mail]
9 Suong T. Nguyen (Bar No. 237557)
[e-mail]
10 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor
11 Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone:
[phone]
12 Facsimile:
[phone]
13 Thomas D. Pease*
[e-mail]
14 Carlos A. Rodriguez*
[e-mail]
15 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
16 New York, New York 10010
Telephone:
[phone]
17 Facsimile:
[phone]
*pro hac vice application to be filed
18
Attorneys for STMicroelectronics, Inc.
19
20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

22

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.,
Case No. 12-CV-2475 JSW

23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiff,
vs.
INVENSENSE, INC.,
Defendant.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CHANGING TIME FOR PATENT L.R. 3-2
DOCUMENT PRODUCTION
ACCOMPANYING DISCLOSURE OF
ASSERTED CLAIMS AND
INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-2475 JSW

Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document54 Filed10/19/12 Page2 of 4

1

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff STMicroelectronics, Inc., (“ST”) and

2 Defendant InvenSense, Inc., (“InvenSense”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their respective
3 undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request an order extending the due date for the Parties’
4 Patent L.R. 3-2 Document Productions Accompanying Disclosure of Asserted Claims and
5 Infringement Contentions by three weeks, from October 19, 2012 to November 9, 2012. This
6 extension of time will provide the Parties the time necessary to prepare and complete the
7 Document Productions. The requested time modification would change no other due dates and
8 would have no effect on the remaining schedule for the case. Accordingly, ST and InvenSense
9 hereby stipulate as follows:
10

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's Case Management Order entered September 14,

11 2012, and pursuant to the Patent Local Rules, the current due date for the Parties’ Patent L.R. 3-2
12 Document Production Accompanying Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement
13 Contentions is October 19, 2012; and
14

WHEREAS the parties have met and conferred and desire to begin their respective Patent

15 L.R. 3-2 production on October 19 but to provide additional time to complete their productions.
16

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:

17

1.

The time for completing the Parties’ Patent L.R. 3-2 Document Productions

18 Accompanying Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions shall be extended
19 by three weeks, from October 19, 2012 to November 9, 2012.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

395.52011/5018562.1

-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-2475 JSW

Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document54 Filed10/19/12 Page3 of 4

1
DATED: October 19, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

2
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

3
4

By: __/s/ Michael D. Powell_______
Michael D. Powell
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.

5
6
7
8
9 DATED: October 19, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

10
11

By: /s/ Rudy Y. Kim
Rudy Y. Kim
Attorneys for Defendant
INVENSENSE, INC.

12
13
14

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE

15
16

I, Michael D. Powell, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this

17 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR PATENT L.R. 3-2
18 DOCUMENT PRODUCTION ACCOMPANYING DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
19
20

AND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby
attest that Rudy Y. Kim has concurred in this filing.

21
22
23

DATED: October 19, 2012

By: /s/ Michael D. Powell
Michael D. Powell

24
25
26
27
28

395.52011/5018562.1

-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-2475 JSW

Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document54 Filed10/19/12 Page4 of 4

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

October 22, 2012
3 Dated: __________________
4

By: ________________________________
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

395.52011/5018562.1

-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 12-CV-2475 JSW