STMicroelectronics,Inc., v. Invensense Inc.

Filing 59

ORDER GRANTING 58 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO DISCLOSE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 12/4/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2012)

Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document58 Filed12/03/12 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
RUDY Y. KIM (CA SBN 199426)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304-1018
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.494.0792
Attorneys for Defendant
INVENSENSE, INC.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

15
16
17
18

v.

Case No. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW
STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO DISCLOSE
INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS

INVENSENSE, INC.,
Defendant.

19
20

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff STMicroelectronics, Inc., (“ST”)

21

and Defendant InvenSense, Inc., (“InvenSense”) (collectively, “Parties”), through their

22

respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and request an order extending the due

23

date for the Parties’ Patent L.R. 3-4 Document Productions Accompanying Disclosure of

24

Invalidity Contentions and Patent L.R. 3-3 Invalidity Contentions by one week, from

25

December 3, 2012 to December 10, 2012. This extension of time will provide the Parties

26

the time necessary to prepare and complete the Invalidity Contentions and accompanying

27

production. The requested time modification would change no other due dates and would

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO DISCLOSE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW
sf-3223663

1

Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document58 Filed12/03/12 Page2 of 3

1

have no effect on the remaining schedule for the case. Accordingly, ST and InvenSense

2

hereby stipulate through their respective counsel of record as follows:

3
4

WHEREAS, on or about May 24, 2012, the Parties stipulated to an extension of
time for InvenSense to respond to the Complaint; and

5
6

WHEREAS, on or about July 27, 2012, the Parties stipulated to an extension of
time for ST to respond to the InvenSense’s Counterclaims; and

7
8

WHEREAS, on or about July 31, 2012, the Court ordered a continuance of the
Case Management Conference; and

9
10

WHEREAS, on or about October 12, 2012, the Court granted an order to shorten
time for hearing; and

11

WHEREAS, on or about October 22, 2012, the Court ordered an extension of

12

time to respond to the Parties’ L.R. 3-2 Document Productions Accompanying Disclosure

13

of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions; and

14

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s Case Management Order entered September

15

14, 2012, and pursuant to the Patent Local Rules, the current due date for the Parties’

16

Invalidity Contentions and accompanying production of documents is December 3, 2012;

17

and

18

WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to prepare their Document

19

Productions Accompanying Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions and Invalidity

20

Contentions, and ST and InvenSense, through their respective counsel of record, have

21

agreed to extend the due date for Document Productions Accompanying Disclosure of

22

Invalidity Contentions and Invalidity Contentions the by one week, from December 3,

23

2012 to December 10, 2012;

24

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto that the Parties shall

25

have to and including December 10, 2012, to exchange their Document Productions

26

Accompanying Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions and Invalidity Contentions.

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO DISCLOSE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW
sf-3223663

2

Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document58 Filed12/03/12 Page3 of 3

1

Dated: December 3, 2012

2

RACHEL KREVANS
RUDY Y. KIM
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

3

By:

4

Attorneys for Defendant
INVENSENSE, INC.

5
6

/s/ Rudy Y. Kim
RUDY Y. KIM

Dated: December 3, 2012

11

CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
SEAN PAK
MICHELLE A. CLARK
LANCE YANG
MICHAEL POWELL
SUONG T. NGUYEN
THOMAS D. PEASE
CARLOS A. RODRIGUEZ
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

12

By:

7
8
9
10

13

/s/ Michael Powell
MICHAEL POWELL
Attorneys for Plaintiff
STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.

14
15

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE
16
I, Rudy Y. Kim, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
17
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. In compliance with
18
General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael Powell has concurred in this filing.
19
20

Dated:

December 3, 2012

21

By:

/s/ Rudy Y. Kim
RUDY Y. KIM

22
23

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27

December 4, 2012
Dated: __________________

By: ________________________________
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO DISCLOSE INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. CV 12-CV-2475 JSW
sf-3223663

3