STMicroelectronics,Inc., v. Invensense Inc.

Filing 85

ORDER Granting Stipulated Request for Extension to File Joint Status Report. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on June 28, 2013. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document84 Filed06/26/13 Page1 of 5 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP  Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com  Sean Pak (Bar No. 219032) seanpak@quinnemanuel.com  50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4788  Telephone: (415) 875-6600 MORRISON FOERSTER LLP Rachel Krevans (Bar No. 116421) RKrevans@mofo.com Esther Kim (Bar No. 258024) EKim@mofo.com 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Rudy Kim (Bar No. 199426) RudyKim@mofo.com 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: 650.813.5600  Michael Powell (Bar No. 202850) mikepowell@quinnemanuel.com  555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Fifth Floor Redwood Shores, CA 94065  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Thomas D. Pease (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) thomaspease@quinnemanuel.com  51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, New York 10010  Telephone: (212) 849-7000 TUROCY & WATSON LLP Vinay Joshi (Bar No. 213487) vjoshi@thepatentattorneys.com 560 S Winchester Blvd Suite 500 San Jose, CA 95128 Telephone: (408) 893-1512  Attorneys for Plaintiff STMicroelectronics, Inc. Attorneys for Defendant InvenSense, Inc.   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA   STMICROELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff,    vs. INVENSENSE, INC., Defendant.  Case No. 12-CV-2475 JSW STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE JOINT STATUS REPORT; DECLARATION OF MICHAEL D. POWELL IN SUPPORT THEREOF   Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiff STMicroelectronics, Inc.  (“ST”) and Defendant InvenSense, Inc. (“INV”) stipulate to and jointly request that the Court  extend the deadline for their submission of the joint report required by the Court’s Order Granting  Motion to Stay Litigation (Docket No. 81):  1. WHEREAS, this Court entered an order on February 27, 2013 staying the litigation;  2. WHEREAS, in its Order, the Court further ordered “the parties to submit a joint  STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 12-CV-2475 JSW Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document84 Filed06/26/13 Page2 of 5 1 status report regarding the status of the reexamination proceedings every 120 days until the stay is 2 lifted); 3 3. WHEREAS, the parties agree that an extension of 30 days is mutually amenable 4 and appropriate to permit the parties to prepare the joint report; 5 4. WHEREAS, the parties will not be prejudiced and the litigation, which is currently 6 stayed, will be unduly delayed by the requested extension; 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, 8 that the parties’ joint status report should be due no later than July 29, 2013. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 DATED: June 26, 2013 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULIVAN, LLP 12 By /s/ Michael D. Powell Michael D. Powell Attorneys for STMicroelectronics Inc. 13 14 15 16 DATED: June 26, 2013 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 17 By /s/ Rudy Kim Rudy Kim Attorneys for InvenSense, Inc. 18 19 20 21 22 23 ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE I, Michael D. Powell, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 24 document. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that counsel for 25 26 27 InvenSense Inc. has concurred in this filing. DATED: June 26, 2013 By: /s/ Michael D. Powell Michael D. Powell 28 -2- STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 12-CV-2475 JSW Case3:12-cv-02475-JSW Document84 Filed06/26/13 Page3 of 5 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 DATED: June 28, 2013 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 By:_____________________________________ Hon. Jeffrey S. White 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Case No. 12-CV-2475 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?