Rochstraser v. Cate

Filing 12

ORDER 11 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/9/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ALEXANDRE L. HOCHSTRASER,

9

Petitioner,

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

11
12
13

No. C 12-2481 SI (pr)
ORDER

v.
MATTHEW CATE,
Secretary of CDCR,
Respondent.
/

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Petitioner's second motion for an enlargement of time to file his traverse is GRANTED.
(Docket # 11.) Petitioner must file and serve his traverse no later than February 28, 2013. No
further extensions of his deadline should be expected.
In his motion, petitioner wrote that he "has only accessed the law library once in his own
interest." Docket # 11, p. 1. If the italicized qualifier means that petitioner has been allowed
into the law library several times but doing other inmates' research and writing, he is cautioned
that he must give his own case the highest priority. Using limited law library time to do other
inmates' legal work does not amount to good cause to extend deadlines in petitioner's own case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 9, 2013
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge