Rochstraser v. Cate

Filing 12

ORDER 11 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ALEXANDRE L. HOCHSTRASER, 9 Petitioner, 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 No. C 12-2481 SI (pr) ORDER v. MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of CDCR, Respondent. / 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Petitioner's second motion for an enlargement of time to file his traverse is GRANTED. (Docket # 11.) Petitioner must file and serve his traverse no later than February 28, 2013. No further extensions of his deadline should be expected. In his motion, petitioner wrote that he "has only accessed the law library once in his own interest." Docket # 11, p. 1. If the italicized qualifier means that petitioner has been allowed into the law library several times but doing other inmates' research and writing, he is cautioned that he must give his own case the highest priority. Using limited law library time to do other inmates' legal work does not amount to good cause to extend deadlines in petitioner's own case. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 9, 2013 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?