Polymathic Properties, Inc. v. Maramag et al
Filing
13
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/22/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
14
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO
STATE COURT FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. C 12-2507 SI
POLYMATHIC PROPERTIES, INC.,
v.
DON G. MARAMAG, et al.,
Defendants.
/
16
On May 16, 2012, pro se defendants Don G. Maramag and Bernardina Maramag removed this
17
unlawful detainer action from state court. Under the well-pleaded complaint rule, the basis for removal
18
jurisdiction must be evident from the complaint. See Franchise Tax Bd. of California v. Construction
19
Laborers Vacation Trust for So. California, 463 U.S. 1, 9-12 (1983) (discussing well-pleaded complaint
20
rule). From the face of the complaint, this Court lacks jurisdiction because there are no federal claims
21
in the lawsuit. Where there is no federal question jurisdiction, an action is not removable on the basis
22
of diversity of citizenship if the defendant is a citizen of the state in which the action was brought. See
23
28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), (b). Here, the notice of removal states that defendants are California residents, and
24
thus removal is improper.
25
Accordingly, defendants are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than July
26
3, 2012 why this case should not be remanded to the Superior Court for the County of Napa. If
27
defendants assert that removal was proper and this Court has jurisdiction, defendants must specifically
28
1
2
identify the basis for jurisdiction.
Until further order of the Court, briefing on plaintiff’s motion to remand is suspended.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: June 22, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?