Fortinet, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.
Filing
60
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 59 STIPULATION to Extend Claim Construction Deadlines. Claims Construction Hearing set for 8/13/2013 01:30 PM. Tutorial Hearing set for 8/6/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3.1.13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)
Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document59 Filed02/27/13 Page1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
STEFANI E. SHANBERG (State Bar No. 206717)
JENNIFER J. SCHMIDT (pro hac vice)
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
One Market Plaza
Spear Tower, Suite 3300
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 947-2000
Facsimile: (415) 947-2099
E-Mail:
sshanberg@wsgr.com
jschmidt@wsgr.com
RYAN R. SMITH (State Bar No. 229323)
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
E-Mail:
rsmith@wsgr.com
11
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FORTINET, INC.
13
14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
FORTINET, INC.,
a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
22
v.
SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
a California corporation,
Defendant.
23
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-02540-JSW
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
DEADLINES
24
WHEREAS, the parties in the above matter seek additional time to meet and confer
25
regarding claim construction related issues. To facilitate those additional meet and confer efforts,
26
the parties seek to extend certain claim construction deadlines as set forth in the following table:
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDERTO
EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-02540-JSW
Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document59 Filed02/27/13 Page2 of 4
1
Event
2
Patent LR 4-2: Exchange
Proposed Claim Constructions
March 1, 2013
March 15, 2013
Patent LR 4-3: Joint Claim
Construction and Prehearing
Statement
April 2, 2013
April 9, 2013
Patent LR 4-4: Completion of
Claim Construction Discovery
May 2, 2013
May 9, 2013
3
4
5
6
Current Deadline
Proposed Deadline
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, that pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 7-12,
8
Plaintiff Fortinet and Defendant SRI, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree
9
to modify certain claim construction deadlines according to the above table. The parties show
10
good cause because the requested extension will facilitate additional meet and confer in an effort
11
to potentially reduce the number of claim terms in dispute.
12
13
Dated: February 27, 2013
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
14
By: /s/ Ryan R. Smith
Ryan R. Smith
15
16
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FORTINET, INC.
17
18
Dated: February 27, 2013
FISH & RICHARDSON
19
20
By: /s/ Frank Albert
Frank Albert
21
Attorneys for Defendant
SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-02540-JSW
-2-
Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document59 Filed02/27/13 Page3 of 4
1
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(i)(3)
2
3
4
I, Ryan Smith, attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from its signatory.
5
By: /s/ Ryan R. Smith
Ryan R. Smith
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-02540-JSW
-3-
Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document59 Filed02/27/13 Page4 of 4
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Court FURTHER ORDERS that the tutorial and markman hearing are continued to August 6
Dated: February ____, 2013 and August 13, 2013 at 1:30 p.m., respectively.
3
4
5
Dated: March 1, 2013
6
HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JDUGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-02540-JSW
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?