Fortinet, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.

Filing 60

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 59 STIPULATION to Extend Claim Construction Deadlines. Claims Construction Hearing set for 8/13/2013 01:30 PM. Tutorial Hearing set for 8/6/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3.1.13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document59 Filed02/27/13 Page1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 STEFANI E. SHANBERG (State Bar No. 206717) JENNIFER J. SCHMIDT (pro hac vice) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation One Market Plaza Spear Tower, Suite 3300 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 947-2000 Facsimile: (415) 947-2099 E-Mail: sshanberg@wsgr.com jschmidt@wsgr.com RYAN R. SMITH (State Bar No. 229323) WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 E-Mail: rsmith@wsgr.com 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC. 13 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 19 20 21 22 v. SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., a California corporation, Defendant. 23 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-02540-JSW JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES 24 WHEREAS, the parties in the above matter seek additional time to meet and confer 25 regarding claim construction related issues. To facilitate those additional meet and confer efforts, 26 the parties seek to extend certain claim construction deadlines as set forth in the following table: 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDERTO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:12-CV-02540-JSW Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document59 Filed02/27/13 Page2 of 4 1 Event 2 Patent LR 4-2: Exchange Proposed Claim Constructions March 1, 2013 March 15, 2013 Patent LR 4-3: Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement April 2, 2013 April 9, 2013 Patent LR 4-4: Completion of Claim Construction Discovery May 2, 2013 May 9, 2013 3 4 5 6 Current Deadline Proposed Deadline 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, that pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1 and 7-12, 8 Plaintiff Fortinet and Defendant SRI, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree 9 to modify certain claim construction deadlines according to the above table. The parties show 10 good cause because the requested extension will facilitate additional meet and confer in an effort 11 to potentially reduce the number of claim terms in dispute. 12 13 Dated: February 27, 2013 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 14 By: /s/ Ryan R. Smith Ryan R. Smith 15 16 Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC. 17 18 Dated: February 27, 2013 FISH & RICHARDSON 19 20 By: /s/ Frank Albert Frank Albert 21 Attorneys for Defendant SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:12-CV-02540-JSW -2- Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document59 Filed02/27/13 Page3 of 4 1 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(i)(3) 2 3 4 I, Ryan Smith, attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatory. 5 By: /s/ Ryan R. Smith Ryan R. Smith 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:12-CV-02540-JSW -3- Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document59 Filed02/27/13 Page4 of 4 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that the tutorial and markman hearing are continued to August 6 Dated: February ____, 2013 and August 13, 2013 at 1:30 p.m., respectively. 3 4 5 Dated: March 1, 2013 6 HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JDUGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES CASE NO. 3:12-CV-02540-JSW -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?