Fortinet, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.

Filing 69

ORDER GRANTING 68 Notice of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/19/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document68-1 Filed04/17/13 Page1 of 2 1 JOHN M. NEUKOM (State Bar No. 275887) ANDREW M. HOLMES (State Bar No. 260475) 2 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 E-Mail: johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 5 drewholmes@quinnemanuel.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff FORTINET, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 FORTINET, INC., a Delaware corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., 15 a California corporation, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Case No. 3:12-cv-02540-JSW-MEJ Case No. 3:12-cv-02540-JSW-MEJ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF FORTINET, INC. Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document68-1 Filed04/17/13 Page2 of 2 1 Having reviewed the Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel for Plaintiff 2 Fortinet, Inc., based on consent, and good cause appearing: 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Stefani E. Shanberg, Christopher Scott Andrews, 4 Jason M. Garr, Jennifer J. Schmidt, Madeleine E. Greene, Michael J. Guo, and Robin L. Brewer of 5 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, be permitted to withdraw as counsel 6 of record, and John M. Neukom and Andrew M. Holmes of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, 7 LLP, may appear as substitute counsel of record for Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc. The Court’s ECF 8 system shall be updated to reflect these changes. 9 10 Dated: _________________________ April 19, 2013 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL Case No. 3:12-cv-02540-JSW-MEJ

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?