Fortinet, Inc. v. SRI International, Inc.
Filing
69
ORDER GRANTING 68 Notice of Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/19/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2013)
Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document68-1 Filed04/17/13 Page1 of 2
1 JOHN M. NEUKOM (State Bar No. 275887)
ANDREW M. HOLMES (State Bar No. 260475)
2 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
E-Mail:
johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com
5
drewholmes@quinnemanuel.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiff
FORTINET, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11 FORTINET, INC.,
a Delaware corporation,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
15 a California corporation,
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
Case No. 3:12-cv-02540-JSW-MEJ
Case No. 3:12-cv-02540-JSW-MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR
PLAINTIFF FORTINET, INC.
Case3:12-cv-02540-JSW Document68-1 Filed04/17/13 Page2 of 2
1
Having reviewed the Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel for Plaintiff
2 Fortinet, Inc., based on consent, and good cause appearing:
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Stefani E. Shanberg, Christopher Scott Andrews,
4 Jason M. Garr, Jennifer J. Schmidt, Madeleine E. Greene, Michael J. Guo, and Robin L. Brewer of
5 Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, be permitted to withdraw as counsel
6 of record, and John M. Neukom and Andrew M. Holmes of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
7 LLP, may appear as substitute counsel of record for Plaintiff Fortinet, Inc. The Court’s ECF
8 system shall be updated to reflect these changes.
9
10 Dated: _________________________
April 19, 2013
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
Case No. 3:12-cv-02540-JSW-MEJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?