Dugan et al v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC
Filing
154
Discovery Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on March 27, 2013. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2013)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
JOHN DUGAN, et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-02549-WHA (NJV)
Plaintiffs,
6
v.
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
MEET AND CONFER
7
8
LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC,
Re: Dkt. No. 126
Defendant.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
The undersigned recently granted in part and denied in part the first motion to retain
12
confidentiality designations filed by defendant Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC (“Lloyds”). See Doc. No.
13
148 (the “March 26, 2013 Order”). Before the court issued the March 26, 2013 Order, Lloyds
14
filed a second motion to retain confidentiality designations. See Doc. No. 126. The undersigned
15
hereby orders the parties to meet and confer regarding the designations at issue in Lloyds’ second
16
motion, using the principles and the reasoning set forth in the March 26, 2013 Order to attempt to
17
resolve their discovery dispute without further court involvement.
18
Plaintiffs’ opposition to the second motion is due to be filed by April 1, 2013, and the
19
motion is scheduled to be heard on April 23, 2013. In order to allow the parties to schedule and
20
engage in a meaningful meet and confer process, those dates are continued by two weeks. In the
21
event the parties are unable to resolve their dispute, Plaintiffs shall file their opposition by April
22
15, 2013, and the motion will be heard on May 7, 2013. The parties may appear telephonically.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 27, 2013
______________________________________
Nandor J. Vadas
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?