Dugan et al v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC
Filing
160
ORDER TO BRING MATERIALS TO CLASS CERTIFICATION HEARING. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 9, 2013.. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JOHN DUGAN, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER TO BRING
MATERIALS TO CLASS
CERTIFICATION HEARING
LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC,
Defendant.
/
15
16
No. C 12-02549 WHA
(1) With respect to the Osmenas, bring to the hearing a signed stack of letters extending
17
the facility and resulting loan and security documents. Highlight and tag the following in the
18
color indicated:
19
i.
any conditions prohibiting the use of the subject property for residential
use by borrower or his/her family (yellow);
21
ii.
any 120% provision (green);
22
iii.
any provision on the interest rate based on cost of funds (blue); and,
23
iv.
governing law provisions and/or forum selection clause (red).
20
24
(2) Provide the same for all other plaintiffs organized as one stack per loan.
25
(3) For each, state in a list whether the borrower redenominated.
26
(4) For each, state in another list whether the 120% cap was ever reached, assuming
27
28
arguendo it has a cap on the overall loan amount (rather than just on the secured portion).
(5) State or show in tabular form:
1
i.
With respect to the Osmenas, how many putative class members had
120% clauses identical to the Osmenas and expressly are governed by the
same law as in the Osmena loan?
ii.
With respect to the Osmenas, how many putative class members had a
cost-of-funds clause identical to the Osmenas and expressly are governed
by the same law as in the Osmena’s loan?
iii.
With respect to the Osmenas, to what extent did each class members’
loan(s) overlap with the same time period as the Osmenas’ loan?
iv.
With respect to the Osmenas, state each class members’ country of
residence (and State, if within the United States) at the time the loan
agreements were executed, and at present.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
(6) Provide the same information for all other plaintiffs as requested in item (5).
9
(7) With respect to Michael Kilroy, please provide a list describing all the ways in which
10
Steptoe as to (i) the 120% clause, (ii) the cost-of-funds clause, and (iii) governing law and forum
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
the Kilroy letter/loan/security documents differ from any of the named plaintiffs represented by
11
12
selection. Also provide a description as to the issues being litigated in the three state court
13
actions, the stakes involved, and why there are three cases.
14
(8) To the maximum extent possible, counsel must agree on a single submission on all of
15
the above.
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: April 9, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?