Dugan et al v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC
Filing
310
ORDER re 309 MOTION for Protective Order re Deposition of A. Hutchinson filed by Jason Ray, Aurora Dugan, Rika Olson, Matthew Tapscott, John Dugan, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 309 MOTION for Protective Order re Deposition of A. Hutchinson. Responses due by 10/29/2013. Telephonic Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2013 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas.Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on October 28, 2013. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2013)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
EUREKA DIVISION
7
8
JOHN DUGAN, et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-02549-WHA (NJV)
Plaintiffs,
9
v.
ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
10
11
LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC,
Re: Dkt. No. 309
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendant.
12
13
14
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for protective order, asking the court to block a third party
15
deposition from going forward on October 31, 2013. Plaintiffs, however, have not moved to have
16
their motion heard on shortened time. Given the urgency of the situation and the costs involved in
17
taking a deposition in London, the court orders Defendant to file its opposition to Plaintiffs’
18
motion no later than 9 a.m. on Tuesday, October 29, 2013. The court will hear oral argument on
19
Tuesday, October 29, 2013 at 2 p.m. The parties shall dial 1-888-684-8852 and enter 1868782# as
20
the access code. The court’s tentative order is to allow the deposition to proceed, a reasonable
21
time after the deponent has produced documents responsive to Plaintiffs’ discovery requests. This
22
order in no way would otherwise modify the discovery deadlines previously imposed by the
23
district court.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 28, 2013
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?