Dugan et al v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC

Filing 310

ORDER re 309 MOTION for Protective Order re Deposition of A. Hutchinson filed by Jason Ray, Aurora Dugan, Rika Olson, Matthew Tapscott, John Dugan, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 309 MOTION for Protective Order re Deposition of A. Hutchinson. Responses due by 10/29/2013. Telephonic Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2013 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas.Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on October 28, 2013. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EUREKA DIVISION 7 8 JOHN DUGAN, et al., Case No. 12-cv-02549-WHA (NJV) Plaintiffs, 9 v. ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 10 11 LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC, Re: Dkt. No. 309 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendant. 12 13 14 Plaintiffs have filed a motion for protective order, asking the court to block a third party 15 deposition from going forward on October 31, 2013. Plaintiffs, however, have not moved to have 16 their motion heard on shortened time. Given the urgency of the situation and the costs involved in 17 taking a deposition in London, the court orders Defendant to file its opposition to Plaintiffs’ 18 motion no later than 9 a.m. on Tuesday, October 29, 2013. The court will hear oral argument on 19 Tuesday, October 29, 2013 at 2 p.m. The parties shall dial 1-888-684-8852 and enter 1868782# as 20 the access code. The court’s tentative order is to allow the deposition to proceed, a reasonable 21 time after the deponent has produced documents responsive to Plaintiffs’ discovery requests. This 22 order in no way would otherwise modify the discovery deadlines previously imposed by the 23 district court. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2013 ______________________________________ NANDOR J. VADAS United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?