Dugan et al v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC

Filing 340

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO SHORTEN TIME AND DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES re 331 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Trial Date and Extend Other Dates, in View of Class Settlement filed by Jason Ray, Aurora Dugan , Rika Olson, Matthew Tapscott, John Dugan, 330 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 329 MOTION for Settlement - Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement - Stipulation to Advance Hearing Date from 12/26/13 to 12/19/13 filed by Aurora Dugan, John Dugan. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 2, 2013. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JOHN DUGAN, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiffs,
v.
LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC.,
Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 12-02549 WHA

ORDER DENYING REQUEST
TO SHORTEN TIME AND
DENYING REQUEST TO
CONTINUE CASE DEADLINES

The parties have filed a request to expedite the hearing on the motion for preliminary

17

approval of class settlement (Dkt. No. 330). Plaintiffs noticed the motion for a hearing on

18

December 26; the request to change this date is DENIED. The hearing shall proceed on the date

19

scheduled by the parties.

20

The parties have filed a request to continue case deadlines relating to the individual

21

claims in light of the proposed settlement of the class claims (Dkt. No. 331). Settlement of class

22

claims does not create good cause to stay individual claims unaffected by the class claims. Good

23

cause not shown, the request is DENIED.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: December 2, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE