Dugan et al v. Lloyds TSB Bank, PLC
Filing
93
COURT-ORDERED INTERROGATORIES AND FOLLOW-UP (due by noon on 1/31/2013). Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/10/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
JOHN DUGAN, AURORA DUGAN and
MATTHEW TAPSCOTT, each individually
and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
12
13
14
and
v.
Defendant.
/
16
18
COURT-ORDERED
INTERROGATORIES
AND FOLLOW-UP
DAVID T. OSMENA and PATRICIA
HOGAN-OSMENA, husband and wife,
and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
19
20
No. C 12-02937 WHA
LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC,
15
17
No. C 12-02549 WHA
Plaintiffs,
v.
22
LLOYDS TSB BANK, PLC, a bank
organized and existing under the laws of
the United Kingdom,
23
Defendants.
21
/
24
25
26
27
28
As a result of the discussion at today’s hearing, the Court now ORDERS Lloyds to answer
under oath the following interrogatories:
1.
Describe all loan products or programs by Lloyds or its affiliates at
any time since January 1, 1990, that utilized, at least as an optional provision, a
cost-of-funds clause.
1
2.
Describe all loan products or programs by Lloyds or its affiliates at
2
any time since January 1, 1990, that utilized a principal-cap provision.
3
These questions are not limited to dual-currency products or programs. Due diligence
4
and good-faith investigation must be used in answering so that the answer can be relied on
5
in making important decisions. Qualifiers like “to my knowledge” should not be used.
6
The answers must be under oath and served by NOON ON JANUARY 31, 2013. The answers
7
should state in full the extent of the investigation and due diligence. Thereafter, plaintiffs’
8
counsel may promptly take follow-up discovery to verify and test the answers.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
Dated: January 10, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?