Saba v. Unisys Corporation
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING 17 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CURRENTLY SET FOR AUGUST 31, 2012. Case Management Statement due by 10/5/2012. Case Management Conference set for 10/12/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/21/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2012)
Case3:12-cv-02578-JSW Document17 Filed08/10/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
ERIC MECKLEY, State Bar No. 168181
ALISON B. WILLARD, State Bar No. 268672
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Telephone: 415.442.1000
Facsimile: 415.442.1001
E-mail: emeckley@morganlewis.com
awillard@morganlewis.com
Attorneys for Defendant
UNISYS CORPORATION
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FADI SABA, on behalf of himself and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
UNISYS CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, and DOES 1 through 50,
15
Case No. CV 12 2578 JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
CURRENTLY SET FOR AUGUST 31,
2012
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
DB2/ 23426920.1
23427286.1
CASE NO. CV 12 2578 JSW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC
Case3:12-cv-02578-JSW Document17 Filed08/10/12 Page2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“F.R.C.P.”) 16(b)(4) and the Court’s May
23, 2012 Order Setting Case Management Conference (Dkt. No. 8), Plaintiff Fadi Saba
(“Plaintiff”) and Defendant UNISYS Corporation (“Defendant”) (together as the “Parties”)
submit this Joint Stipulation to Continue the Case Management Conference currently set for
August 31, 2012. In support thereof, the Parties stipulate and agree as follows:
7
On May 25, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Class Action
8
Complaint for damages, injunctive relief, and restitution (“Complaint”) in its entirety. Dkt. No.
9
10.
10
11
12
13
14
On July 20, 2012, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, and provided the
Plaintiff with leave to amend the Complaint no later than August 8, 2012. Dkt. No. 15.
Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on August 8, 2012 pursuant to the
Court’s Order on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. Nos. 15 and 16.
15
Defendant currently has until August 22, 2012 to respond to the FAC.
16
Based upon the current schedule, the Parties would be required to hold their Rule 26(f)
17
18
meet and confer session by August 10, 2012, file their joint case management statement on
August 24, 2012, and attend the case management conference on August 31, 2012.
19
20
Given that Plaintiff recently filed his FAC on August 8, pursuant to the Court’s Order, and
21
that Defendant has not yet had a sufficient opportunity to evaluate Plaintiff’s amended claim and
22
evaluate whether it intends to respond to the FAC via an answer or a motion to dismiss, good
23
cause exists for a continuance, as it would serve the interests of judicial economy and make the
24
best use of the Parties’ resources by allowing the Parties a more fulsome opportunity to
25
26
27
28
substantively evaluate the claims in the new FAC and their respective positions, hold their Rule
26(f) meet and confer session on August 17, 2012 to discuss the same, and prepare for the case
management conference.
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
1
CASE NO. CV 12 2578 JSW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
PALO ALTO
DB2/ 23427286.1
23426920.1
Case3:12-cv-02578-JSW Document17 Filed08/10/12 Page3 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Pursuant to F.R.C.P 16(b)(4) and Civil Local Rule 16-2(e), a court’s scheduling order may
be modified for “good cause” and with the court’s consent. This is the Parties’ first request to
modify the scheduling order, the Parties’ request is made in good faith, and the request will not to
cause unnecessary delay or prejudice to these proceedings. The Parties therefore request that the
Court continue the case management conference currently scheduled for August 31, 2012 for
three weeks to September 21, 2012, or any later date that better suits the Court’s calendar.
August 10, 2012
By: /S/ Glicel Sumagaysay
Glicel Sumagaysay
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FADI SABA
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
10
11
12
August 10, 2012
13
By: /S/ Eric Meckley
Eric Meckley
Attorneys for Defendant
UNISYS CORPORATION
14
15
16
17
18
19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED
Good cause having been shown, the Court approves the Parties’ Stipulation to Continue
20
Case Management Conference and orders that the Case Management Conference is continued
21
October 12, 2012
from August 31, 2012 until __________________. The Parties must file their joint case
22
management conference statement five (5) court days prior to the Case Management Conference.
23
24
August 21, 2012
Dated:______________________
25
___________________________
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
DB2/ 23426920.1
23427286.1
2
CASE NO. CV 12 2578 JSW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?