Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust v. Armagost et al

Filing 24

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST re 23 Letter filed by Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/12/2013. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2013)

Download PDF
DUANE B. BEESON NEIL BODINE ROBERT BONSALL GEOFFREY PILLER CATHERINE E. AROSTEGUI JOHN C. PROVOST ANDREW H. BAKER SHEILA K. SEXTON MATTHEW MORBELLO DALE L. BRODSKY TEAGUE P. PATERSON COSTA KERESTENZIS DAVID WEINTRAUB MARGARET A. GEDDES SARAH SANDFORD-SMITH PETER M. MCENTEE SUSAN K. GAREA VISHTASP SOROUSHIAN OAKLAND OFFICE BEESON, TAYER & BODINE Ross HOUSE, SUITE 200 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 483 NINTH STREET A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION OAKLAND, CA 94607-4051 520 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 300 FAX (510) 625-8275 (510) 625-9700 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814-47 I 4 (916) 325-2100 DONALD FAX (916) 325-2120 S. TAYER (I932-2001) WWW.BEESONTAYER.COM pmcentee@beesontayer.com April 12, 2013 ADRIAN BARNES CHRISTOPHER HAMMER DALISAI NISPEROS Maria-Elena James Magistrate Judge United States District Court, Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Teamsters Benefit Trust v. David Armagost and Tina Armagost (Case No. CV-12-2587 MEJ) Dear Honorable Maria-Elena James: I am writing on behalf of Plaintiff to request a further extension of time to April 15, 2013 to submit its Motion for Default Judgment. We had fully intended to file the motion today, but unfortunately our client is unable to provide us with a signed declaration until Monday, April 15, 2012. Thank you for your time and attention to this request and please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need anything further. RT ER A H 327891.doc (1330-0173) James LI NO na aria-Ele udge M J R NIA TED GRAN FO UNIT ED S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S PMM/cjb N F D IS T IC T O R C DATED: 4/12/2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?