Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust v. Armagost et al

Filing 37

ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White adopting Report and Recommendations and granting 25 Motion for Default Judgment. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 TRUSTEES ON BEHALF OF TEAMSTERS BENEFIT TRUST, 9 No. C 12-02587 JSW Plaintiff, 10 For the Northern District of California United States District Court v. 11 12 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT DAVID ARMAGOST and TINA ARMAGOST, 13 Defendants. / 14 15 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and 16 Recommendation (“Report”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, in which she 17 recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. The deadline for 18 filing objections to the Report has passed, and neither party has filed objections. 19 The Court has considered the Report, relevant legal authority, and the record in this 20 case. The Court finds the Report thorough and well reasoned and adopts it in every respect. 21 Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. The Court enters default 22 judgment as to Plaintiff’s first claim for equitable restitution pursuant to ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 23 1132(a)(3), and enters default against Defendants David and Tina Armagost in the amount of 24 $111,754.54 in damages, $4,775.00 in attorneys’ fees (comprised of 19.1 hours of attorney time 25 at a rate of $250 per hour), and $1,825.23 in costs (all costs with the exception of online legal 26 research fees). 27 28 1 The Court shall issue a separate judgment, and the Clerk shall close the file. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: June 4, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?