Trustees on Behalf of Teamsters Benefit Trust v. Armagost et al
Filing
37
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White adopting Report and Recommendations and granting 25 Motion for Default Judgment. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
TRUSTEES ON BEHALF OF TEAMSTERS
BENEFIT TRUST,
9
No. C 12-02587 JSW
Plaintiff,
10
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
v.
11
12
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION RE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
DAVID ARMAGOST and TINA
ARMAGOST,
13
Defendants.
/
14
15
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and
16
Recommendation (“Report”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, in which she
17
recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. The deadline for
18
filing objections to the Report has passed, and neither party has filed objections.
19
The Court has considered the Report, relevant legal authority, and the record in this
20
case. The Court finds the Report thorough and well reasoned and adopts it in every respect.
21
Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. The Court enters default
22
judgment as to Plaintiff’s first claim for equitable restitution pursuant to ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §
23
1132(a)(3), and enters default against Defendants David and Tina Armagost in the amount of
24
$111,754.54 in damages, $4,775.00 in attorneys’ fees (comprised of 19.1 hours of attorney time
25
at a rate of $250 per hour), and $1,825.23 in costs (all costs with the exception of online legal
26
research fees).
27
28
1
The Court shall issue a separate judgment, and the Clerk shall close the file.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: June 4, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?