CSR Technology, Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 of Dismissal Without Prejudice of All Claims and Counterclaims Concerning U.S. Patent No. 6,757,324 between CSR Technology Inc. and Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/25/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

MARK D. FOWLER, Bar No. 124235
[e-mail]
TIMOTHY LOHSE, Bar No. 177230
[e-mail]
MICHAEL G. SCHWARTZ, Bar No. 197010
[e-mail]
ERIK R. FUEHRER, Bar No. 252578
[e-mail]
SUMMER KRAUSE, Bar No. 264858
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
TIFFANY MILLER, Bar No. 246987
[e-mail]
ROBERT WILLIAMS, Bar No. 246990
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant
CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
20

CSR TECHNOLOGY INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24

v.
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation,

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02619-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
OF ALL CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS
CONCERNING U.S. PATENT NO. 6,757,324
BETWEEN CSR TECHNOLOGY INC. AND
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

Defendant.

25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

WEST\239247824.1

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ALL
CLAIMS CONCERNING U.S. PATENT NO. 6,757,324, CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-RS

1

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff and Counter-defendant CSR

2

Technology Inc. (“CSR”), on one hand, and Defendant and Counterclaimant Freescale

3

Semiconductor, Inc. (“Freescale”), on the other hand, by and through their respective counsel of

4

record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

5

1.

In this action, CSR asserts claims of patent infringement under United States

6

Patent Nos. 6,388,590 (the “’590 patent”), 6,388,591 (the “’591 patent”), 6,933,886 (the “’886

7

patent”), 6,882,827 (the “’827 patent”) and 6,757,324 (the “’324 patent”) (collectively, “the

8

patents-in-suit”) against Freescale.

9
10
11

2.

Freescale filed an Answer and asserted Counterclaims of declaratory judgment of

non-infringement and invalidity as to each of the patents-in-suit.
3.

CSR’s Fourth Claim Of Relief for infringement of the ’324 patent against

12

Freescale in the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. CSR is dismissing

13

only its claims against Freescale relating to the ’324 patent, and expressly maintains all of CSR’s

14

claims for relief against Freescale concerning the ’590 patent (First Claim for Relief), ’591 patent

15

(Second Claim for Relief), ’886 patent (Third Claim for Relief) and ’827 patent (Fifth Claim for

16

Relief) to this action.

17

4.

Freescale’s Count IV counterclaim for declaratory judgment for invalidity and

18

non-infringement of the ’324 patent in the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without

19

prejudice.

20

5.

CSR and Freescale each shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees in connection

21

with the dismissal of CSR’s Fourth Claim for Relief for infringement of the ’324 patent and

22

Freescale’s Count IV counterclaim for declaratory judgment for invalidity and non-infringement

23

of the ’324 patent.

24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

-1WEST\239247824.1

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ALL
CLAIMS CONCERNING U.S. PATENT NO. 6,757,324, CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-RS

1

Dated: October 19, 2012

2

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

3
4

By /s/ Michael G. Schwartz
MARK D. FOWLER
TIMOTHY LOHSE
MICHAEL G. SCHWARTZ
TIFFANY MILLER
ROBERT WILLIAMS
ERIK R. FUEHRER
SUMMER KRAUSE

5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant
CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.

9
10
11

Dated: October 19, 2012
JONES DAY

12
13

By /s/ David L. Witcoff
Patrick T. Michael
David L. Witcoff (Pro Hac Vice)
Timothy J. Heverin (Pro Hac Vice)
Thomas W. Ritchie (Pro Hac Vice)

14
15
16

Attorneys for Plaintiff
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.

17
18
19
20
21
22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

10/25/12
DATED: ____________________

23

Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

-2WEST\239247824.1

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ALL
CLAIMS CONCERNING U.S. PATENT NO. 6,757,324, CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-RS

1
2

ECF CERTIFICATION
I, Michael G. Schwartz, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being

3

used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice of All Claims

4

and Counterclaims Concerning U.S. Patent No. 6,757,324 between CSR Technology Inc. and

5

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. in compliance with General Order No. 45, Section X(B). I hereby

6

attest that David L. Witcoff has concurred in this filing.

7
8

DATED: October 19, 2012

/s/ Michael G. Schwartz
MICHAEL G. SCHWARTZ

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO

-3WEST\239247824.1

STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF ALL
CLAIMS CONCERNING U.S. PATENT NO. 6,757,324, CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-RS