CSR Technology, Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

Filing 66

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 65 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Continue Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement filed by CSR Technology, Inc., Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 24, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MARK D. FOWLER, Bar No. 124235 mark.fowler@dlapiper.com TIMOTHY LOHSE, Bar No. 177230 timothy.lohse@dlapiper.com MICHAEL G. SCHWARTZ, Bar No. 197010 michael.schwartz@dlapiper.com ERIK R. FUEHRER, Bar No. 252578 erik.fuehrer@dlapiper.com SUMMER KRAUSE, Bar No. 264858 summer.krause@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 Tel: 650.833.2000 Fax: 650.833.2001 ROBERT WILLIAMS, Bar No. 246990 robert.williams@dlapiper.com DLA PIPER LLP (US) 401 B Street, Suite 1700 San Diego, CA 92101 Tel: 619.699.2700 Fax: 619.699.2701 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant CSR TECHNOLOGY INC. Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745) pmichael@jonesday.com JONES DAY 555 California Street, 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 626-3939 Facsimile: (415) 875-5700 David L. Witcoff (IL Bar No. 6183629) (admitted pro hac vice) dlwitcoff@jonesday.com Timothy J. Heverin (IL Bar No. 6243107) (admitted pro hac vice) tjheverin@jonesday.com Thomas W. Ritchie (IL Bar No. 6301954) (admitted pro hac vice) twritchie@jonesday.com JONES DAY 77 W. Wacker Dr., Ste. 3500 Chicago, IL 60601-1692 Telephone: (312) 782-3939 Facsimile: (312) 782-8585 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 CSR TECHNOLOGY INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff and Counterdefendant, 20 21 CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02619-JST (JSC) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT v. 22 23 FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant and Counterclaimant. 24 25 26 27 28 DLA P IPER LLP (US) EAST PAL O AL TO WEST\241514840.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-JST (JSC) 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff and Counter-defendant CSR 2 Technology Inc. (“CSR”) and Defendant and Counterclaimant Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 3 (“Freescale”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby 4 stipulate and agree as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS, on March 7, 2013, the Court issued Case Management Order No. 2, setting certain deadlines (Dkt. No. 61). WHEREAS, the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement is currently due on June 24, 2013. WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred regarding the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement on June 11th, June 18th and June 20th 2013. WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a continuation of the filing date for the Joint Claim 12 Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement by one day, to June 25, 2013, would allow the parties 13 additional time to meet and confer regarding the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing 14 Statement. 15 WHEREAS, the short continuation of the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing 16 Statement would not conflict with, or require any additional changes to, the current case schedule 17 as the Claim Construction briefing, hearing and tutorial dates would remain unchanged. 18 19 20 WHEREAS, the requested time modification will have no effect on any other date in the schedule for the case. WHEREAS, the parties have not previously stipulated to change any date relating to Joint 21 Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement and the only prior extensions of time granted in 22 this case are the Court’s June 26, 2012, order granting Freescale a thirty-day extension of time to 23 respond to CSR’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 12) and the Magistrate Judge Corley’s January 7, 2013, 24 order modifying the briefing schedule and hearing date for Freescale’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. 25 No. 48). 26 27 -1- 28 DLA P IPER LLP (US) EAST PAL O AL TO WEST\241514840.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-JST (JSC) 1 2 IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, that the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement shall be continued as follows: 3 Event Current Due Date New Due Date Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement June 24, 2013 June 25, 2013 4 5 6 7 Dated: June 21, 2013 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 8 9 By /s/ Michael Schwartz MARK D. FOWLER TIMOTHY LOHSE MICHAEL G. SCHWARTZ ROBERT WILLIAMS ERIK R. FUEHRER SUMMER KRAUSE 10 11 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant CSR TECHNOLOGY INC. 14 15 Dated: June 21, 2013 JONES DAY 16 17 By /s/ Thomas W. Ritchie Patrick T. Michael David L. Witcoff (Pro Hac Vice) Timothy J. Heverin (Pro Hac Vice) Thomas W. Ritchie (Pro Hac Vice) 18 19 20 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -2- 28 DLA P IPER LLP (US) EAST PAL O AL TO WEST\241514840.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-JST 1 I, Michael Schwartz, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM 3 CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1, I 4 hereby attest that David Witcoff has concurred in this filing. 5 6 Dated: June 21, 2013 DLA PIPER LLP (US) 7 By /s/ Michael G. Schwartz MICHAEL G. SCHWARTZ 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant CSR Technology Inc. 10 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 Dated: June 24, 2013 THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -3- 28 DLA P IPER LLP (US) EAST PAL O AL TO WEST\241514840.1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT, CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?