CSR Technology, Inc. v. Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
Filing
66
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 65 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Continue Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement filed by CSR Technology, Inc., Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 24, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
MARK D. FOWLER, Bar No. 124235
mark.fowler@dlapiper.com
TIMOTHY LOHSE, Bar No. 177230
timothy.lohse@dlapiper.com
MICHAEL G. SCHWARTZ, Bar No. 197010
michael.schwartz@dlapiper.com
ERIK R. FUEHRER, Bar No. 252578
erik.fuehrer@dlapiper.com
SUMMER KRAUSE, Bar No. 264858
summer.krause@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
2000 University Avenue
East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214
Tel: 650.833.2000
Fax: 650.833.2001
ROBERT WILLIAMS, Bar No. 246990
robert.williams@dlapiper.com
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
401 B Street, Suite 1700
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: 619.699.2700
Fax: 619.699.2701
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant
CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.
Patrick T. Michael (SBN 169745)
pmichael@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
555 California Street, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 626-3939
Facsimile:
(415) 875-5700
David L. Witcoff (IL Bar No. 6183629)
(admitted pro hac vice)
dlwitcoff@jonesday.com
Timothy J. Heverin (IL Bar No. 6243107)
(admitted pro hac vice)
tjheverin@jonesday.com
Thomas W. Ritchie (IL Bar No. 6301954)
(admitted pro hac vice)
twritchie@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
77 W. Wacker Dr., Ste. 3500
Chicago, IL 60601-1692
Telephone:
(312) 782-3939
Facsimile:
(312) 782-8585
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counterclaimant,
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19
CSR TECHNOLOGY INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
20
21
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-02619-JST (JSC)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING
STATEMENT
v.
22
23
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant and
Counterclaimant.
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO
WEST\241514840.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT,
CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-JST (JSC)
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff and Counter-defendant CSR
2
Technology Inc. (“CSR”) and Defendant and Counterclaimant Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
3
(“Freescale”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby
4
stipulate and agree as follows:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
WHEREAS, on March 7, 2013, the Court issued Case Management Order No. 2, setting
certain deadlines (Dkt. No. 61).
WHEREAS, the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement is currently due on
June 24, 2013.
WHEREAS, the Parties met and conferred regarding the Joint Claim Construction and
Pre-Hearing Statement on June 11th, June 18th and June 20th 2013.
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that a continuation of the filing date for the Joint Claim
12
Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement by one day, to June 25, 2013, would allow the parties
13
additional time to meet and confer regarding the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing
14
Statement.
15
WHEREAS, the short continuation of the Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing
16
Statement would not conflict with, or require any additional changes to, the current case schedule
17
as the Claim Construction briefing, hearing and tutorial dates would remain unchanged.
18
19
20
WHEREAS, the requested time modification will have no effect on any other date in the
schedule for the case.
WHEREAS, the parties have not previously stipulated to change any date relating to Joint
21
Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement and the only prior extensions of time granted in
22
this case are the Court’s June 26, 2012, order granting Freescale a thirty-day extension of time to
23
respond to CSR’s Complaint (Dkt. No. 12) and the Magistrate Judge Corley’s January 7, 2013,
24
order modifying the briefing schedule and hearing date for Freescale’s Motion to Compel (Dkt.
25
No. 48).
26
27
-1-
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO
WEST\241514840.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT,
CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-JST (JSC)
1
2
IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED, that the Joint Claim Construction and
Pre-Hearing Statement shall be continued as follows:
3
Event
Current Due Date
New Due Date
Joint Claim Construction
and Pre-Hearing Statement
June 24, 2013
June 25, 2013
4
5
6
7
Dated: June 21, 2013
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
8
9
By /s/ Michael Schwartz
MARK D. FOWLER
TIMOTHY LOHSE
MICHAEL G. SCHWARTZ
ROBERT WILLIAMS
ERIK R. FUEHRER
SUMMER KRAUSE
10
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant
CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.
14
15
Dated: June 21, 2013
JONES DAY
16
17
By /s/ Thomas W. Ritchie
Patrick T. Michael
David L. Witcoff (Pro Hac Vice)
Timothy J. Heverin (Pro Hac Vice)
Thomas W. Ritchie (Pro Hac Vice)
18
19
20
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
-2-
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO
WEST\241514840.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT,
CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-JST
1
I, Michael Schwartz, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM
3
CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT. In compliance with Local Rule 5-1, I
4
hereby attest that David Witcoff has concurred in this filing.
5
6
Dated: June 21, 2013
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
7
By /s/ Michael G. Schwartz
MICHAEL G. SCHWARTZ
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-defendant
CSR Technology Inc.
10
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14
Dated: June 24, 2013
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
-3-
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
EAST PAL O AL TO
WEST\241514840.1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE JOINT CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT,
CASE NO. 3-12-CV-02619-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?