Cook v. Astrue
Filing
6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/16/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 12-2627 RS
MICHAEL COOK,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
Plaintiff,
v.
13
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
14
Defendant.
____________________________________/
15
16
On May 24, 2012 an order issued directing plaintiff file a written brief within 30 days
17
showing, cause, if any he had, why this action should not be dismissed in light of the fact that it was
18
filed in state court in violation of the Court’s prior orders, it was filed before plaintiff received the
19
final agency decision, and it is duplicative of Case No. C 12-2336 RS. The time period for filing a
20
response has expired, and plaintiff has submitted none. Accordingly, good cause appearing, this
21
action is dismissed and the Clerk shall close the file. Plaintiff is advised that this order has no effect
22
on his pending petition for review of the Social Security Agency’s final decision regarding the
23
Supplemental Social Security Income checks that were returned to it. That matter remains pending
24
and active under Case No. C 12-2336 RS.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: 7/16/12
27
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
1
NO. C 12‐2627 RS
1
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT A HARD COPY OF THIS ORDER WAS MAILED TO:
2
3
4
5
Michael Cook
T-79529
Pelican Bay State Prison
Post Office Box 7500
Crescent City, CA 95532
6
7
8
DATED: 7/16/12
9
/s/ Chambers Staff
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Chambers of Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
NO. C 12‐2627 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?