Smith -v- Overland Contracting, Inc.
Filing
51
ORDER RE: STATEMENT OF FACTS. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/28/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2013)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
Northern District of California
3
4
MITCHELL SMITH,
5
No. C 12-2642 MEJ
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: STATEMENT OF FACTS
v.
6
OVERLAND CONTRACTING, INC., et al.,
7
8
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
9
On July 3, 2013, the parties filed a Joint Statement of Facts, which listed five undisputed
pages in length, the Court finds that the parties failed to comply with the spirit of the joint statement
12
For the Northern District of California
facts. Dkt. No. 38. Given that the facts in Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment exceed ten
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
requirement. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
13
(1)
Defendant shall file a statement by September 3, 2013, setting forth each material fact on
14
which it relies in support of its Motion. Each material fact in the separate statement must be
15
set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and must refer to a specific admissible portion
16
of the record where the fact finds support (for example, affidavit, deposition, discovery
17
response, etc.).
18
(2)
Plaintiff shall file a statement by September 9, 2013, setting forth: (a) for each paragraph of
19
Defendant’s statement of facts, a correspondingly numbered paragraph indicating whether he
20
disputes the statement of fact set forth in that paragraph and a reference to the specific
21
admissible portion of the record supporting his position if the fact is disputed; and (b) any
22
additional facts included in his Opposition, set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and
23
including reference(s) to a specific admissible portion of the record where the fact finds
24
support.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: August 28, 2013
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?