P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Defendant LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co., LTD. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 5/22/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 (Stipulating Parties Listed on Signature Pages) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST ) Master File No. 3:07-cv-05944-SC LITIGATION ) MDL No. 1917 ) ) ) Case No. 11-cv-01656 SC This Document Relates to: ) Case No. 11-cv-05381 SC Case No. 11-cv-05502 SC Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et ) Case No. 11-cv-05513 SC ) al., 11-cv-01656 (SC) (N.D. Cal.); ) Case No. 11-cv-05514 SC ) Case No. 11-cv-06275 SC Stoebner, et al. v. LG Electronics, et al., No. 11-cv- ) Case No. 11-cv-06276 SC 05381 (SC) (N.D. Cal); ) Case No. 11-cv-06396 SC ) Case No. 11-cv-06397 SC ____ Siegel v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-05502 (SC) ) Case No. ____ (N.D. Cal.); ) Case No. ) Best Buy Co., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv- ) ) 05513 (SC) (N.D.Cal.); ) CORRECTED STIPULATION AND Target Corp., et al. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., ) [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ) No. 11-cv-05514 (SC) (N.D. Cal.); ) DEFENDANT LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD. Interbond Corporation of America v. Hitachi, et al., ) ) No 11-cv-06275 (SC) (N.D. Cal.); ) Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi Ltd., et al., 11-cv-06276 ) ) (SC) (N.D. Cal.); ) Compucom Systems, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. ) ) 11-cv-06396 (SC) (N.D. Cal.); ) Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. ) ) 11-cv-06397 (SC) (N.D. Cal.); ) ) P.C. Richard and Son Long Island Corp., et al. v. ) Hitachi, Ltd., et al., (docket assignment ) pending); ) Shultze Agency Services, LLC, et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., ) ) et al., (docket assignment pending). ) -1CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD. MDL NO. 1917 1 2 3 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the undersigned Plaintiffs and Defendant LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co. Ltd. (“LGETT”) as follows: 1. The Complaints in the above-captioned actions and all claims asserted in them by 4 Plaintiffs against LGETT are dismissed, without prejudice and without costs, pursuant to Rule 41(a) 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The undersigned parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this Stipulation as an Order. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: May 18, 2012 By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno William A. Isaacson Jennifer Milici BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20015 Telephone: (202) 237-2727 Facsimile: (202) 237-6131 Email: wisaacson@bsfllp.com Email: jmilici@bsfllp.com Stuart Singer BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Facsimile: (954) 356-0022 Email: ssinger@bsfllp.com Philip J. Iovieno Anne M. Nardacci BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor Albany, NY 12207 Telephone: (518) 434-0600 Facsimile: (518) 434-0665 Email: piovieno@bsfllp.com Email: anardacci@bsfllp.com Liaison Counsel for Direct Action Plaintiffs and Attorneys for Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc., Electrograph Technologies, Corp., Office Depot, Inc., Compucom Systems, Inc., Interbond Corporation of America, P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, Marta Cooperative of America, Inc., ABC Appliance, Inc., and Schultze Agency Services LLC on behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC and Tweeter Newco, LLC -2- CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD. MDL NO. 1917 1 2 By: /s/ 3 Roman M. Silberfeld, (SBN 62783) David Martinez, (SBN 193183) ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P. 2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208 Telephone: (310) 552-0130 Facsimile: (310) 229-5800 Email: RMSilberfeld@rkmc.com Email: DMartinez@rkmc.com 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 David Martinez Attorneys For Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc, Best Buy Purchasing LLC, Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc., Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, L.L.C., and Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Jonathan J. Ross H. Lee Godfrey Kenneth S. Marks Jonathan J. Ross Johnny W. Carter David M. Peterson SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 651-9366 Facsimile: (713) 654-6666 Email: lgodfrey@sumangodfrey.com Email: kmarks@susmangodfrey.com Email: jross@susmangodfrey.com Email: jcarter@susmangodfrey.com Email: dpeterson@susmangodfrey.com Parker C. Folse III Rachel S. Black Jordan Connors SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, Washington 98101-3000 Telephone: (206) 516-3880 Facsimile: (206) 516-3883 Email: pfolse@susmangodfrey.com Email: rblack@susmangodfrey.com Email: jconnors@susmangodfrey.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee of the Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust -3CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD. MDL NO. 1917 1 By: /s/ David J. Burman 2 DAVID J. BURMAN (pro hac vice) NICHOLAS H. HESTERBERG (pro hac vice) Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800 Seattle, WA 98101-3099 Telephone: (206) 359-8000 Facsimile: (206) 359-9000 Email: DBurman@perkinscoie.com Email: NHesterberg@perkinscoie.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 Euphemia N. Thomopulos, Cal. Bar No. 262107 Perkins Coie LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94111-4131 Telephone: (415) 344.7000 Facsimile: (415) 344.7050 Email: EThomopulos@perkinscoie.com 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation 9 10 13 14 By: /s/ Jason Murray 15 Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806) CROWELL & MORING LLP 515 South Flower St., 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 622-4750 Facsimile: (213) 622-2690 Email: jmurray@crowell.com 16 17 18 19 20 Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corp.; Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Kmart Corp.; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys, Inc.; RadioShack Corp. 21 22 By: /s/ James P. McCarthy 23 Jessica L. Meyer, (SBN: 249064) James M. Lockhart (pro hac vice) James P. McCarthy (pro hac vice) Kelly G. Laudon (pro hac vice) Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L.P. 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 371-3211 Facsimile: (612) 371-3207 -4- 24 25 26 27 28 CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD. MDL NO. 1917 Email: Email: Email: Email: 1 2 3 jmeyer@lindquist.com jlockhart@lindquist.com jmccarthy@lindquist.com klaudon@lindquist.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs John R. Stoebner, As Chapter 7 Trustee for PBE Consumer Electronics, LLC and related entities; And Douglas A. Kelley, as Chapter 11 Trustee for Petters Company, Inc. and Related Entities, and as Receive for Petters Company, LLC and related entities 4 5 6 7 By: /s/ Wilson D. Mudge 8 WILSON D. MUDGE (pro hac vice) Email: wilson.mudge@aporter.com ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 555 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: (202) 942-5000 Facsimile: (202) 942--5999 9 10 11 12 ERIC MASON (SBN 259233) Email: eric.mason@aporter.com ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, Forty-Fourth Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-5844 Telephone: (213) 243-4000 Facsimile: (213) 243-4199 13 14 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co., Ltd. 17 18 19 20 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 21 22 S FO A H ER 27 28 onti amuel C Judge S RT Hon. Samuel Conti LI 5/22/12 ERED O ORD IT IS S NO 26 Dated: UNIT ED 25 RT U O 24 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 N F D IS T IC T O R C -5CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD. MDL NO. 1917

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?