P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Defendant LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co., LTD. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 5/22/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2012)
1
(Stipulating Parties Listed on Signature Pages)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
)
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST ) Master File No. 3:07-cv-05944-SC
LITIGATION
) MDL No. 1917
)
)
) Case No. 11-cv-01656 SC
This Document Relates to:
) Case No. 11-cv-05381 SC
Case No. 11-cv-05502 SC
Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et ) Case No. 11-cv-05513 SC
)
al., 11-cv-01656 (SC) (N.D. Cal.);
) Case No. 11-cv-05514 SC
) Case No. 11-cv-06275 SC
Stoebner, et al. v. LG Electronics, et al., No. 11-cv- ) Case No. 11-cv-06276 SC
05381 (SC) (N.D. Cal);
) Case No. 11-cv-06396 SC
) Case No. 11-cv-06397 SC
____
Siegel v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv-05502 (SC) ) Case No.
____
(N.D. Cal.);
) Case No.
)
Best Buy Co., et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. 11-cv- )
)
05513 (SC) (N.D.Cal.);
)
CORRECTED STIPULATION AND
Target Corp., et al. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd., ) [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
)
No. 11-cv-05514 (SC) (N.D. Cal.);
) DEFENDANT LG ELECTRONICS
TAIWAN TAIPEI CO., LTD.
Interbond Corporation of America v. Hitachi, et al., )
)
No 11-cv-06275 (SC) (N.D. Cal.);
)
Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi Ltd., et al., 11-cv-06276 )
)
(SC) (N.D. Cal.);
)
Compucom Systems, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. )
)
11-cv-06396 (SC) (N.D. Cal.);
)
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al., No. )
)
11-cv-06397 (SC) (N.D. Cal.);
)
)
P.C. Richard and Son Long Island Corp., et al. v.
)
Hitachi, Ltd., et al.,
(docket assignment
)
pending);
)
Shultze Agency Services, LLC, et al. v. Hitachi, Ltd., )
)
et al.,
(docket assignment pending).
)
-1CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN
TAIPEI CO., LTD.
MDL NO. 1917
1
2
3
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the undersigned
Plaintiffs and Defendant LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei Co. Ltd. (“LGETT”) as follows:
1.
The Complaints in the above-captioned actions and all claims asserted in them by
4
Plaintiffs against LGETT are dismissed, without prejudice and without costs, pursuant to Rule 41(a)
5
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2.
The undersigned parties jointly and respectfully request that the Court enter this
Stipulation as an Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: May 18, 2012
By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno
William A. Isaacson
Jennifer Milici
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20015
Telephone: (202) 237-2727
Facsimile: (202) 237-6131
Email: wisaacson@bsfllp.com
Email: jmilici@bsfllp.com
Stuart Singer
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
Telephone: (954) 356-0011
Facsimile: (954) 356-0022
Email: ssinger@bsfllp.com
Philip J. Iovieno
Anne M. Nardacci
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: (518) 434-0600
Facsimile: (518) 434-0665
Email: piovieno@bsfllp.com
Email: anardacci@bsfllp.com
Liaison Counsel for Direct Action Plaintiffs and
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Electrograph Systems, Inc.,
Electrograph Technologies, Corp., Office Depot, Inc.,
Compucom Systems, Inc., Interbond Corporation of
America, P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation,
Marta Cooperative of America, Inc., ABC Appliance,
Inc., and Schultze Agency Services LLC on behalf of
Tweeter Opco, LLC and Tweeter Newco, LLC
-2-
CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN
TAIPEI CO., LTD.
MDL NO. 1917
1
2
By: /s/
3
Roman M. Silberfeld, (SBN 62783)
David Martinez, (SBN 193183)
ROBINS, KAPLAN, MILLER & CIRESI L.L.P.
2049 Century Park East, Suite 3400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3208
Telephone: (310) 552-0130
Facsimile: (310) 229-5800
Email: RMSilberfeld@rkmc.com
Email: DMartinez@rkmc.com
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
David Martinez
Attorneys For Plaintiffs Best Buy Co., Inc, Best Buy
Purchasing LLC, Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc.,
Best Buy Stores, L.P., Bestbuy.com, L.L.C., and
Magnolia Hi-Fi, Inc.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
By: /s/
Jonathan J. Ross
H. Lee Godfrey
Kenneth S. Marks
Jonathan J. Ross
Johnny W. Carter
David M. Peterson
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: (713) 651-9366
Facsimile: (713) 654-6666
Email: lgodfrey@sumangodfrey.com
Email: kmarks@susmangodfrey.com
Email: jross@susmangodfrey.com
Email: jcarter@susmangodfrey.com
Email: dpeterson@susmangodfrey.com
Parker C. Folse III
Rachel S. Black
Jordan Connors
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
Seattle, Washington 98101-3000
Telephone: (206) 516-3880
Facsimile: (206) 516-3883
Email: pfolse@susmangodfrey.com
Email: rblack@susmangodfrey.com
Email: jconnors@susmangodfrey.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Alfred H. Siegel, as Trustee of the
Circuit City Stores, Inc. Liquidating Trust
-3CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN
TAIPEI CO., LTD.
MDL NO. 1917
1
By: /s/ David J. Burman
2
DAVID J. BURMAN
(pro hac vice)
NICHOLAS H. HESTERBERG
(pro hac vice)
Perkins Coie LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: (206) 359-8000
Facsimile: (206) 359-9000
Email: DBurman@perkinscoie.com
Email: NHesterberg@perkinscoie.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
11
Euphemia N. Thomopulos, Cal. Bar No. 262107
Perkins Coie LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94111-4131
Telephone: (415) 344.7000
Facsimile: (415) 344.7050
Email: EThomopulos@perkinscoie.com
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff Costco Wholesale Corporation
9
10
13
14
By: /s/ Jason Murray
15
Jason C. Murray (CA Bar No. 169806)
CROWELL & MORING LLP
515 South Flower St., 40th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 622-4750
Facsimile: (213) 622-2690
Email: jmurray@crowell.com
16
17
18
19
20
Counsel for Plaintiffs Target Corp.; Sears, Roebuck
and Co.; Kmart Corp.; Old Comp Inc.; Good Guys,
Inc.; RadioShack Corp.
21
22
By: /s/ James P. McCarthy
23
Jessica L. Meyer, (SBN: 249064)
James M. Lockhart (pro hac vice)
James P. McCarthy (pro hac vice)
Kelly G. Laudon (pro hac vice)
Lindquist & Vennum P.L.L.P.
4200 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: (612) 371-3211
Facsimile: (612) 371-3207
-4-
24
25
26
27
28
CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN
TAIPEI CO., LTD.
MDL NO. 1917
Email:
Email:
Email:
Email:
1
2
3
jmeyer@lindquist.com
jlockhart@lindquist.com
jmccarthy@lindquist.com
klaudon@lindquist.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs John R. Stoebner, As Chapter 7
Trustee for PBE Consumer Electronics, LLC and
related entities; And Douglas A. Kelley, as Chapter 11
Trustee for Petters Company, Inc. and Related Entities,
and as Receive for Petters Company, LLC and related
entities
4
5
6
7
By: /s/ Wilson D. Mudge
8
WILSON D. MUDGE (pro hac vice)
Email: wilson.mudge@aporter.com
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
555 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone:
(202) 942-5000
Facsimile:
(202) 942--5999
9
10
11
12
ERIC MASON (SBN 259233)
Email: eric.mason@aporter.com
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
777 South Figueroa Street, Forty-Fourth Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-5844
Telephone:
(213) 243-4000
Facsimile:
(213) 243-4199
13
14
15
16
Attorneys for Defendant LG Electronics Taiwan Taipei
Co., Ltd.
17
18
19
20
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
21
22
S
FO
A
H
ER
27
28
onti
amuel C
Judge S
RT
Hon. Samuel Conti
LI
5/22/12
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
26
Dated:
UNIT
ED
25
RT
U
O
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
-5CORRECTED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING DEF. LG ELECTRONICS TAIWAN
TAIPEI CO., LTD.
MDL NO. 1917
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?