Lopez Tax Service, Inc. et al v. The Income Tax School, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING 41 STIPULATION to Extend ENE Deadline. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 12/5/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-02654-JSW Document41 Filed12/04/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 GAUNTLETT & ASSOCIATES David A. Gauntlett (SBN 96399) James A. Lowe (SBN 214383) Andrew M. Sussman (SBN 112418) 18400 Von Karman, Suite 300 Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: (949) 553-1010 Facsimile: (949) 553-2050 jal@gauntlettlaw.com ams@gauntlettlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lopez Tax Service, Inc., Carlos C. Lopez, Kristeena S. Lopez, and Latino Tax Professionals Association, LLC 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Nicholas Ranallo (SBN 275016) Attorney at Law 371 Dogwood Way Boulder Creek, California 95006 Telephone: (831) 703-4011 Facsimile: (831-533-5073 nick@ranallolawoffice.com Christopher E. Gatewood [Pro Hac Vice ] THRESHOLD COUNSEL, PC 1905 Huguenot Road, Suite 200 Richmond, Virginia 23235 Telephone: (804) 677-0947 Facsimile: (804) 482-2641 chris@thresholdcounsel.com Attorneys for Defendant The Income Tax School 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 20 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 21 22 LOPEZ TAX SERVICE, INC., et al., 23 Plaintiffs, 24 vs. 25 26 27 28 THE INCOME TAX SCHOOL, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV12-02654-JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION DEADLINE [Civ. L.R. 7-12] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case3:12-cv-02654-JSW Document41 Filed12/04/12 Page2 of 3 1 Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-12, Plaintiffs LOPEZ TAX SERVICE, INC., CARLOS C. LOPEZ, 2 KRISTEENA S. LOPEZ and LATINO TAX PROFESSIONALS ASSOCIATION, LLC, 3 (collectively “Lopez”) and Defendant THE INCOME TAX SCHOOL, INC. (“ITS”) hereby stipulate 4 and agree to request an extended deadline to complete Early Neutral Evaluation in this case. This 5 stipulation is based on the following: 6 7 8 1) Per local rules, the Court originally ordered the Parties to complete the ENE within 90 days of October 31, 2012, or January 29, 2013. 2) In their November 27, 2012 initial conference call with William Fenwick, the 9 appointed Evaluator, the Parties and Evaluator agreed that it may be reasonable and necessary to 10 extend the ENE deadlines. The parties believe that the ENE will be more effective after each has 11 had the opportunity to conduct their respective depositions. The Lopez parties are scheduled to 12 depose individuals associated with ITS on December 10-12, 2012. ITS has likewise scheduled 13 depositions of the Lopez parties for January 7-9, 2013. 14 15 16 3) The Parties, their counsel, and the Evaluator are available and have agreed to hold the ENE on January 29, 2013. 4) The parties seek to extend the ENE deadline to March 1, 2013, to allow the parties 17 sufficient time to conduct a meaningful evaluation on January 29th and to allow for a potential 18 follow-up session, if necessary. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: December 4, 2012 GAUNTLETT & ASSOCIATES By: /s/ Andrew M. Sussman David A. Gauntlett James A. Lowe Andrew M. Sussman Attorneys for Plaintiffs Lopez Tax Service, Inc., Carlos C. Lopez, Kristeena S. Lopez, and Latino Tax Professionals Association, LLC 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case3:12-cv-02654-JSW Document41 Filed12/04/12 Page3 of 3 1 Dated: December 4, 2012 Nicholas Ranallo, Attorney at Law By: /s/ Nicholas Ranallo Nicholas Ranallo 371 Dogwood Way Boulder Creek, CA 95006 2 3 4 Christopher E. Gatewood [Pro Hac Vice] THRESHOLD COUNSEL, PC 1905 Huguenot Road, Suite 200 Richmond, VA 23235 Telephone: (804) 677-0947 Facsimile: (804) 482-2641 chris@thresholdcounsel.com 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant The Income Tax School, Inc. 9 10 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 15 December 5, 2012 Dated: ____________________________ _________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?