White v. Lucky Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Stipulation to Extend Mediation Deadline by Save Mart Supermarkets, Inc., RMP Properties LLC, Lucky Stores, Inc. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 3/29/2013. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)
1
2
3
4
COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP
One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94111-4213
415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9 DONNA WHITE,
Plaintiff,
10
11
Case No. C12-02677 EDL
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME FOR ADR MEDIATION
v.
12 LUCKY STORES, INC.; SAVE MART
SUPERMARKETS, INC.; and RMP
13 PROPERTIES, LLC; and DOES 1-10,
Inclusive,
14
Defendants.
15
Complaint Filed: May 24, 2012
Trial Date:
None Set
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07383.008 2366753v1
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR ADR MEDIATION
C12-02677 EDL
1
This matter having come before the Court by stipulation of Defendants Lucky Stores, Inc.,
2 Save Mart Supermarkets, and RMP Properties, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff
3 Donna White (“Plaintiff”) (together with Defendants, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel
4 of record, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court
COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP
One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94111-4213
415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663
5
6
HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES THAT:
1. The deadline for the Parties to conclude their mediation is extended for thirty (30)
7 days, to and including April 29, 2013.
8
9
March 29, 2013
10 Dated: _______________, 2013
11
________________________________________
HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07383.008 2366753v1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR ADR MEDIATION
C12-02677 EDL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?