White v. Lucky Stores, Inc. et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Stipulation to Extend Mediation Deadline by Save Mart Supermarkets, Inc., RMP Properties LLC, Lucky Stores, Inc. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 3/29/2013. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94111-4213 415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 DONNA WHITE, Plaintiff, 10 11 Case No. C12-02677 EDL [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR ADR MEDIATION v. 12 LUCKY STORES, INC.; SAVE MART SUPERMARKETS, INC.; and RMP 13 PROPERTIES, LLC; and DOES 1-10, Inclusive, 14 Defendants. 15 Complaint Filed: May 24, 2012 Trial Date: None Set 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07383.008 2366753v1 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR ADR MEDIATION C12-02677 EDL 1 This matter having come before the Court by stipulation of Defendants Lucky Stores, Inc., 2 Save Mart Supermarkets, and RMP Properties, LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) and Plaintiff 3 Donna White (“Plaintiff”) (together with Defendants, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel 4 of record, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court COBLENTZ, PATCH, DUFFY & BASS LLP One Ferry Building, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94111-4213 415.391.4800 • Fax 415.989.1663 5 6 HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES THAT: 1. The deadline for the Parties to conclude their mediation is extended for thirty (30) 7 days, to and including April 29, 2013. 8 9 March 29, 2013 10 Dated: _______________, 2013 11 ________________________________________ HONORABLE ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07383.008 2366753v1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR ADR MEDIATION C12-02677 EDL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?