United States of America and State of California Ex Rel. et al v. Kiewit Pacific Company et al

Filing 90

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 78 MOTION to Dismiss Defendants' Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, to Stay filed by Kiewit Infrastructure Group, Kiewit Pacific Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 11, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA EX REL: RUSTY FRYBERGER, et al., Plaintiffs, 9 v. 10 11 KIEWIT PACIFIC COMPANY, et al., Case No. 12-cv-02698-JST ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Re: ECF No. 78 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. ECF No. 78. Pursuant to Federal Rule 14 of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds that the parties’ briefs have 15 thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter suitable for disposition without oral 16 argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for March 20, 2014, is hereby 17 VACATED. 18 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 19 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 21 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 22 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 23 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 24 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 11, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?