United States of America v. Approximately $35,040 in United States Currency et al

Filing 44

ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White adopting Report and Recommendations and granting 30 Motion for Default Judgment. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 13 14 15 No. C 12-02703 JSW Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (1) APPROXIMATELY $35,040 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, and (2) APPROXIMATELY $36,085 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 16 Defendants. 17 / 18 19 This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and 20 Recommendation (“Report”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu, in which she 21 recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. The deadline for 22 filing objections to the Report has passed, and neither party has filed objections. 23 The Court has considered the Report, relevant legal authority, and the record in this 24 case. The Court finds the Report thorough and well reasoned and adopts it in every respect. 25 Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. The Court condemns and 26 causes to be forfeited to the United States currency in the amounts of $35,040 and $36,085, 27 pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6). Further, the Court vests all rights, title and interest in said 28 currency to the United States. 1 The Court shall issue a separate judgment, and the Clerk shall close the file. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: June 3, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?