Ua Cruadhlaoich v. Bryson

Filing 93

ORDER REGARDING RULE 56(d) Motion(edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 MATTHEW A. I. UA CRUADHLAOICH, Plaintiff, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 No. C -12-02723(EDL) ORDER REGARDING RULE 56(d) MOTION v. PENNY S. PRITZKER, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 / Plaintiff recently filed a motion to continue or deny Defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d). The Court orders Defendant to file any opposition to this motion by Friday, April 18, 2014, at noon. The opposition is limited to five pages, and there will be no reply. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 15, 2014 ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?