Ua Cruadhlaoich v. Bryson
Filing
93
ORDER REGARDING RULE 56(d) Motion(edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
MATTHEW A. I. UA CRUADHLAOICH,
Plaintiff,
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
No. C -12-02723(EDL)
ORDER REGARDING RULE 56(d)
MOTION
v.
PENNY S. PRITZKER, SECRETARY, U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
12
Defendant.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
/
Plaintiff recently filed a motion to continue or deny Defendant’s motion for summary
judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d). The Court orders Defendant to file any
opposition to this motion by Friday, April 18, 2014, at noon. The opposition is limited to five pages,
and there will be no reply.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 15, 2014
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?